Decreased Urine N6-methyladenosine level is closely associated with the presence of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus
To investigate the dynamic changes of urine N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) and evaluate the clinical significance.BackgroundTo investigate the dynamic changes of urine N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels in patients with typ...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Vol. 13; p. 986419 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
27.09.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To investigate the dynamic changes of urine N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) and evaluate the clinical significance.BackgroundTo investigate the dynamic changes of urine N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) and evaluate the clinical significance.First, the levels of urine m6A were examined and compared among 62 patients with T2DM, 70 patients with DN, and 52 age- and gender-matched normal glucose tolerant subjects (NGT) by using a MethyIFIashTM Urine m6A Quantification Kit. Subsequently, we compared the concentrations of urine m6A between different stages of DN. Moreover, statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association of urine m6A with DN.MethodsFirst, the levels of urine m6A were examined and compared among 62 patients with T2DM, 70 patients with DN, and 52 age- and gender-matched normal glucose tolerant subjects (NGT) by using a MethyIFIashTM Urine m6A Quantification Kit. Subsequently, we compared the concentrations of urine m6A between different stages of DN. Moreover, statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association of urine m6A with DN.The levels of m6A were significantly decreased in patients with DN [(16.10 ± 6.48) ng/ml], compared with NGT [(23.12 ± 7.52) ng/ml, P < 0.0001] and patients with T2DM [(20.39 ± 7.16) ng/ml, P < 0.0001]. Moreover, the concentrations of urine m6A were obviously reduced with the deterioration of DN. Pearson rank correlation and regression analyses revealed that m6A was significantly associated with DN (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) were 0.783 (95% CI, 0.699 - 0.867, P < 0.0001) for the DN and NGT groups, and 0.737 (95% CI, 0.639 - 0.835, P < 0.0001) for the macroalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria groups, and the optimal cutoff value for m6A to distinguish the DN from NGT and the macroalbuminuria from normoalbuminuria cases was 0.4687 (diagnostic sensitivity, 71%; diagnostic specificity, 76%) and 0.4494 (diagnostic sensitivity, 79%; diagnostic specificity, 66%), respectively.ResultsThe levels of m6A were significantly decreased in patients with DN [(16.10 ± 6.48) ng/ml], compared with NGT [(23.12 ± 7.52) ng/ml, P < 0.0001] and patients with T2DM [(20.39 ± 7.16) ng/ml, P < 0.0001]. Moreover, the concentrations of urine m6A were obviously reduced with the deterioration of DN. Pearson rank correlation and regression analyses revealed that m6A was significantly associated with DN (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) were 0.783 (95% CI, 0.699 - 0.867, P < 0.0001) for the DN and NGT groups, and 0.737 (95% CI, 0.639 - 0.835, P < 0.0001) for the macroalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria groups, and the optimal cutoff value for m6A to distinguish the DN from NGT and the macroalbuminuria from normoalbuminuria cases was 0.4687 (diagnostic sensitivity, 71%; diagnostic specificity, 76%) and 0.4494 (diagnostic sensitivity, 79%; diagnostic specificity, 66%), respectively.The levels of urine m6A are significantly decreased in patients with DN and change with the deterioration of DN, which could serve as a prospective biomarker for the diagnosis of DN.ConclusionsThe levels of urine m6A are significantly decreased in patients with DN and change with the deterioration of DN, which could serve as a prospective biomarker for the diagnosis of DN. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Kumar Ganesan, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Dhamodharan Umapathy, Anna University, India Edited by: Ramkumar Kunka Mohanram, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India These authors have contributed equally to this work This article was submitted to Clinical Diabetes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology |
ISSN: | 1664-2392 1664-2392 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fendo.2022.986419 |