Creative Potential in Science: Conceptual and Measurement Issues

This paper examines the concept of creative potential as it applies in science. First, conceptual issues concerning the definition of creative potential are explored, highlighting that creative potential is a moving target, and measures of creative potential are estimates of future behavior. Then th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 750224
Main Authors Lubart, Todd, Kharkhurin, Anatoliy V., Corazza, Giovanni Emanuele, Besançon, Maud, Yagolkovskiy, Sergey R., Sak, Ugur
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper examines the concept of creative potential as it applies in science. First, conceptual issues concerning the definition of creative potential are explored, highlighting that creative potential is a moving target, and measures of creative potential are estimates of future behavior. Then three main ways to detect creative potential are examined. First, a person’s previous accomplishments in science can be analyzed. These accomplishments can be regarded as predictors of future creative performance. Second, science talent competitions can help to detect creative potential in children and adolescents. There are particular types of talent competitions differing from each other by the extent of focusing on individual (e.g., Science Fairs) or collaborative (e.g., Science Olympiads) work. Third, to measure an individual’s creative potential, psychometric tools such as Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT), Test of Scientific Creativity Animations for Children (TOSCAC), and Evaluation of Potential Creativity (EPoC) can be used. These tools are conceptualized in terms of two scientific activities: hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing. In a final section, these three types of measures are placed in a novel time-space framework as applied to creative potential. Suggestions for future work are also discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Reviewed by: Sheyla Blumen, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Peru; Bianca Fox, Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom; Valentina Marinescu, University of Bucharest, Romania
This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Gregory John Feist, San Jose State University, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750224