Antibiotic Prescription in Veterinary Consultations in Bhutan: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
The veterinary prescription of antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) remains largely undocumented. In Bhutan, however, the national veterinary service keeps records of their activities and prescriptions, which offer an opportunity to establish a benchmark to assess the use of these...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in veterinary science Vol. 8; p. 641488 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
28.05.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The veterinary prescription of antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) remains largely undocumented. In Bhutan, however, the national veterinary service keeps records of their activities and prescriptions, which offer an opportunity to establish a benchmark to assess the use of these agents in this and other LMIC. A cross-sectional retrospective study was designed and 2,266 handwritten veterinary records from 2017 were sampled from 23 animal health premises (AHPs) to estimate individual and an overall proportion of consultations that resulted in an antibiotic prescription. The frequency of antibiotic prescription per species, type of AHP, and according to WHO's AWaRe index and OIE list of priority antimicrobials were also explored. It was estimated that 31% (95% confidence interval: 29–33%; intracluster correlation: 0.03) of the veterinary consultations resulted in an antibiotic prescription. The incidence of antibiotic prescription was highest in consultations of poultry across AHP. Across species,
diarrhea and wounds
were frequently treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics including sulfonamides, tetracyclines, trimethoprim + sulfa, and penicillin. Between 45% and 70% antibiotics prescribed correspond to AWaRe's
access group
and up to 25% to AWaRe's
watch group
. Over 70% of antibiotics dispensed in veterinary consultations for any species correspond to the OIE's
veterinary critically important antimicrobial agents
. Overall, the study demonstrated positive features of veterinary antimicrobial stewardship in Bhutan, given the conservative proportion of consultation that results in this type of prescription and the type of antibiotic prescribed. Although the veterinary service closely follows the Bhutanese Standard Treatment Guidelines, the prescription of antibiotics to key species should be closely monitored. Our study suggests that further improvements of antibiotic stewardship can be achieved through standardisation of antibiotic prescription to some species, a revision of the guidelines toward reducing the prescription of antibiotics of high relevance for human medicine, and by including details of clinical investigation, use of tests, and treatment outcomes in veterinary consultation records. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science Edited by: Roswitha Merle, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Reviewed by: Annemarie Kaesbohrer, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria; Cedric Muentener, University of Zurich, Switzerland |
ISSN: | 2297-1769 2297-1769 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fvets.2021.641488 |