Methods to Develop an in silico Clinical Trial: Computational Head-to-Head Comparison of Lisdexamfetamine and Methylphenidate

Regulatory agencies encourage computer modeling and simulation to reduce the time and cost of clinical trials. Although still not classified in formal guidelines, system biology-based models represent a powerful tool for generating hypotheses with great molecular detail. Herein, we have applied a me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychiatry Vol. 12; p. 741170
Main Authors Gutiérrez-Casares, José Ramón, Quintero, Javier, Jorba, Guillem, Junet, Valentin, Martínez, Vicente, Pozo-Rubio, Tamara, Oliva, Baldomero, Daura, Xavier, Mas, José Manuel, Montoto, Carmen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 03.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Regulatory agencies encourage computer modeling and simulation to reduce the time and cost of clinical trials. Although still not classified in formal guidelines, system biology-based models represent a powerful tool for generating hypotheses with great molecular detail. Herein, we have applied a mechanistic head-to-head in silico clinical trial (ISCT) between two treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, to wit lisdexamfetamine (LDX) and methylphenidate (MPH). The ISCT was generated through three phases comprising (i) the molecular characterization of drugs and pathologies, (ii) the generation of adult and children virtual populations (vPOPs) totaling 2,600 individuals and the creation of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, and (iii) data analysis with artificial intelligence methods. The characteristics of our vPOPs were in close agreement with real reference populations extracted from clinical trials, as did our PBPK models with in vivo parameters. The mechanisms of action of LDX and MPH were obtained from QSP models combining PBPK modeling of dosing schemes and systems biology-based modeling technology, i.e., therapeutic performance mapping system. The step-by-step process described here to undertake a head-to-head ISCT would allow obtaining mechanistic conclusions that could be extrapolated or used for predictions to a certain extent at the clinical level. Altogether, these computational techniques are proven an excellent tool for hypothesis-generation and would help reach a personalized medicine.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Computational Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Edited by: Michael Noll-Hussong, Saarland University Hospital, Germany
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Reviewed by: Yoram Vodovotz, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Ji-Won Chun, Catholic University of Korea, South Korea
ISSN:1664-0640
1664-0640
DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.741170