Correlates of Objectively Measured Physical Activity Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Identifying correlates of physical activity (PA) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential to design effective PA interventions. Methods: Participants completed a battery of questionnaires and wore an ActiGraph accelerometer. Light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences Vol. 2; p. 726436
Main Authors Fortune, Jennifer, Norris, Meriel, Stennett, Andrea, Kilbride, Cherry, Lavelle, Grace, Hendrie, Wendy, DeSouza, Lorraine, Victor, Christina, Ryan, Jennifer Mary
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 10.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Identifying correlates of physical activity (PA) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential to design effective PA interventions. Methods: Participants completed a battery of questionnaires and wore an ActiGraph accelerometer. Light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (min/day) were calculated. Associations were examined using multiple linear regression adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders. Results: Fifty-eight adults with MS participated (mean ± SD age: 56.8 ± 9.2 yr; 67% women). MS type was associated with time in LPA. Participants with secondary progressive MS ( B = −54.0, 95% CI −84.7 to −23.3) and primary progressive MS ( B = −42.9, 95% CI −77.5 to −8.3) spent less time in LPA than those with relapsing remitting MS. Walking capacity, assessed using the 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12), was associated with time in MVPA ( B = −0.36, 95% CI −0.72 to −0.01). Conclusion: This work identifies walking capacity and type of MS as correlates of PA, which may indicate development of interventions to promote PA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Winand H. Dittrich, FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, Germany
Present address: Jennifer Fortune and Jennifer Mary Ryan, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
Grace Lavelle, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Andrea Stennett, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
Reviewed by: Zhuoying Qiu, China Rehabilitation Research Center/WHO Collaborating Center for Family International Classifications, China; Masauso Chirwa, University of Zambia, Zambia
This article was submitted to Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion, a section of the journal Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
ISSN:2673-6861
2673-6861
DOI:10.3389/fresc.2021.726436