Correlates of Objectively Measured Physical Activity Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Identifying correlates of physical activity (PA) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential to design effective PA interventions. Methods: Participants completed a battery of questionnaires and wore an ActiGraph accelerometer. Light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigor...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Vol. 2; p. 726436 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
10.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
Identifying correlates of physical activity (PA) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential to design effective PA interventions.
Methods:
Participants completed a battery of questionnaires and wore an ActiGraph accelerometer. Light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (min/day) were calculated. Associations were examined using multiple linear regression adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders.
Results:
Fifty-eight adults with MS participated (mean ± SD age: 56.8 ± 9.2 yr; 67% women). MS type was associated with time in LPA. Participants with secondary progressive MS (
B
= −54.0, 95% CI −84.7 to −23.3) and primary progressive MS (
B
= −42.9, 95% CI −77.5 to −8.3) spent less time in LPA than those with relapsing remitting MS. Walking capacity, assessed using the 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12), was associated with time in MVPA (
B
= −0.36, 95% CI −0.72 to −0.01).
Conclusion:
This work identifies walking capacity and type of MS as correlates of PA, which may indicate development of interventions to promote PA. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Winand H. Dittrich, FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, Germany Present address: Jennifer Fortune and Jennifer Mary Ryan, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland Grace Lavelle, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom Andrea Stennett, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom Reviewed by: Zhuoying Qiu, China Rehabilitation Research Center/WHO Collaborating Center for Family International Classifications, China; Masauso Chirwa, University of Zambia, Zambia This article was submitted to Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion, a section of the journal Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences |
ISSN: | 2673-6861 2673-6861 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fresc.2021.726436 |