Empagliflozin Significantly Prevents the Doxorubicin-induced Acute Cardiotoxicity via Non-antioxidant Pathways

Empagliflozin (EMPA) is a SGLT-2 inhibitor that has positive effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the possible protective effects of EMPA against doxorubicin (DOX)-induced acute cardiotoxicity. Non-diabetic Sprague–Dawley rats were randomized into four groups. The co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCardiovascular toxicology Vol. 21; no. 9; pp. 747 - 758
Main Authors Barış, Veysel Özgür, Dinçsoy, Adnan Berk, Gedikli, Esra, Zırh, Selim, Müftüoğlu, Sevda, Erdem, Ayşen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.09.2021
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Empagliflozin (EMPA) is a SGLT-2 inhibitor that has positive effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the possible protective effects of EMPA against doxorubicin (DOX)-induced acute cardiotoxicity. Non-diabetic Sprague–Dawley rats were randomized into four groups. The control group received serum physiologic (1 ml), the EMPA group received EMPA, the DOX group was administered cumulatively 18 mg/kg body weight DOX. The DOX+EMPA group was administered DOX and EMPA. In the DOX group, LVDED (P < 0.05) and LVSED ( P  < 0.01), QTc interval ( P  < 0.001), the ratio of karyolysis and karyorrhexis ( P  < 0.001) and infiltrative cell proliferation ( P  < 0.001) were found to be higher than; EF, FS and normal cell morphology were lower than the control group ( P  < 0.001). In the DOX+EMPA group, LVEDD ( P  < 0.05) and LVESD ( P  < 0.01) values, QTc interval ( P  < 0.001), karyolysis and karyorrhexis ratios ( P  < 0.001) and infiltrative cell proliferation were lower ( P  < 0.01); normal cell morphology and EF were higher compared to the DOX group ( P  < 0.001). Our results showed that empagliflozin significantly ameliorated DOX-induced acute cardiotoxicity.
ISSN:1530-7905
1559-0259
DOI:10.1007/s12012-021-09665-y