Standardization of clinical protocols in oral malodor research

• Published in: Journal of breath research Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. 17101 - 17110
• Main Authors: Yaegaki, Ken, Brunette, Donald M, Tangerman, Albert, Choe, Yong-Sahm, Winkel, Edwin G, Ito, Sayaka, Kitano, Tomohiro, Ii, Hisataka, Calenic, Bogdan, Ishkitiev, Nikolay, Imai, Toshio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England IOP Publishing 01.03.2012
• Subjects: Biomedical Research - standards; Breath Tests - methods; Chromatography, Gas; Clinical Protocols - standards; guideline; halitosis; Halitosis - diagnosis; Humans; Mouth; Oral Hygiene; oral malodor; research design; Sulfur Compounds - analysis; volatile sulfur compounds
• ISSN: 1752-7155; 1752-7163; 1752-7163
• DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/6/1/017101

The objective of this study is to standardize protocols for clinical research into oral malodor caused by volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs). To detect VSCs, a gas chromatograph (GC) using a flame photometric detector equipped with a bandpass filter (at 393 nm) is the gold standard (sensitivity: 5 × 10−11 gS s−1). The baselines of VSC concentrations in mouth air varied considerably over a week. When the subjects refrained from eating, drinking and oral hygiene including mouth rinsing, the VSC concentrations remained constant until eating. Over a 6 h period after a meal, VSC concentrations decreased dramatically (p < 0.01). These results point to optimal times and conditions for sampling subjects. Several portable devices were compared with the measurements by the GCs. Portable GCs demonstrated capabilities similar to those of the GCs. We also applied the recommended protocols described below to clinical research testing the efficacy of ZnCl2 products, and confirmed that using the recommended protocols in a randomized crossover design would provide very clear results. Proposed protocols include: (a) a short-term study rather than a long-term study is strongly recommended, since the VSC concentrations are constant in the short term; (b) a crossover study would be the best design to avoid the effects of individual specificities on each clinical intervention; (c) measurements of VSCs should preferably be carried out using either a GC or portable GCs.