A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics
In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identi...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 586 - 594 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Society for Neuroscience
17.01.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2521-16.2017 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1–250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDS
low
). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (
p
< 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (
p
= 0.096). tRNS, tIDS
low
, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1-250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDS
). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (
< 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (
= 0.096). tRNS, tIDS
, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.
This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics. In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1-250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDSlow). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDSlow, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics.In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1-250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDSlow). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDSlow, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics. In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1–250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDS low ). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS ( p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS ( p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDS low , and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics. In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1–250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDSlow). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDSlow, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES. |
Author | Cancelli, Andrea Salustri, Carlo Porcaro, Camillo Cottone, Carlo Pasqualetti, Patrizio Tecchio, Franca |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Carlo orcidid: 0000-0002-0262-1551 surname: Cottone fullname: Cottone, Carlo – sequence: 2 givenname: Andrea surname: Cancelli fullname: Cancelli, Andrea – sequence: 3 givenname: Patrizio orcidid: 0000-0001-5560-1979 surname: Pasqualetti fullname: Pasqualetti, Patrizio – sequence: 4 givenname: Camillo surname: Porcaro fullname: Porcaro, Camillo – sequence: 5 givenname: Carlo surname: Salustri fullname: Salustri, Carlo – sequence: 6 givenname: Franca orcidid: 0000-0002-1325-5059 surname: Tecchio fullname: Tecchio, Franca |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUFPGzEQhS0EKgH6F5ClXnpgg-312rFUVUJRWqiiIEF6No53Fox2bbB3g_Lv6xQatVx6sQ_zvdF7847Qvg8eEDqlZEwrVp7_WMx-3lzfTq_GrGK0oGLMCJV7aJSnqmCc0H00IkySQnDJD9FRSo-EEJmhD-iQKapEydgI3V3gBbyc4Ut3_1DMmsZZYzdneBG882uT3BrwMhqfbH6cafGsBdtHZ_Ft77qhNb0LHi8HDzXuA54Hm5kFDDHUG286Z9MJOmhMm-Dj23-Mlt9my-llMb_-fjW9mBeWc9bnANzUQJhiRBFuwdSUU8JKTsBY1dTAZPZrKsaFWJU5UqYnTHLOq1VNRXmMvr6ufRpWHdQWfB9Nq5-i60zc6GCc_nfi3YO-D2stKiXoROUFn98WxPA8QOp155KFtjUewpA0VZJKUglSZfTTO_QxDNHndDq751xNlCSZOv3b0c7Kn9tnQLwCNoaUIjQ7hBK9LVnvStbbkjUVeltyFn55J7Su_91ETuba_8l_AVpgrdc |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhac274 crossref_primary_10_3389_fncir_2018_00044 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_909421 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12111578 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_913410 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0129065722500319 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13040574 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2023_114073 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1152394 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2020_101589 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_48905_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119109 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2024_1363128 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2020_609768 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics10070836 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_54595_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fninf_2023_1173597 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12091179 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2025_1548478 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2024_1401068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2019_07_023 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_19 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2759-09.2009 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.074 10.3233/RNN-140411 10.1126/science.1179867 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1414-13.2013 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0600-15.2015 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.027 10.1177/1073858416631966 10.1126/science.1179850 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00131 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.027 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.398 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0868-16.2016 10.1002/hbm.20367 10.1016/S0079-6107(96)00009-0 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.038 10.1093/cercor/bhj008 10.1007/s00429-016-1328-4 10.1073/pnas.1318750111 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0978-11.2011 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.023 10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.001 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.004 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129163 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.016 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002032 10.1038/35094565 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3763-12.2013 10.1515/RNS.2011.042 10.1002/hbm.20998 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0. Copyright Society for Neuroscience Jan 17, 2018 Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0. – notice: Copyright Society for Neuroscience Jan 17, 2018 – notice: Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QR 7TK 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 P64 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2521-16.2017 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1529-2401 |
EndPage | 594 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6596189 29196322 10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2521_16_2017 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 2WC 34G 39C 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAFWJ AAJMC AAYXX ABBAR ABIVO ACGUR ACNCT ADBBV ADCOW ADHGD AENEX AFCFT AFOSN AFSQR AHWXS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 HYE H~9 KQ8 L7B OK1 P0W P2P QZG R.V RHI RPM TFN TR2 W8F WH7 WOQ X7M YBU YHG YKV YNH YSK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QR 7TK 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 P64 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-164ade02920904cead14102340eac9fde27322a52466b3474ade8274445bd163 |
ISSN | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:24:43 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 04:06:38 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 16:51:26 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:53:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:47:42 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:51 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | primary motor area transcranial electric stimulation Functional Source Separation (FSS) personal/individual dynamics of neuronal activity transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation EEG |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-164ade02920904cead14102340eac9fde27322a52466b3474ade8274445bd163 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Author contributions: F.T. designed research; C.C. and A.C. performed research; C.C., A.C., P.P., C.P., and F.T. analyzed data; P.P., C.C., C.S., and F.T. wrote the paper. |
ORCID | 0000-0002-0262-1551 0000-0002-1325-5059 0000-0001-5560-1979 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/38/3/586.full.pdf |
PMID | 29196322 |
PQID | 2094498970 |
PQPubID | 2049535 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6596189 proquest_miscellaneous_1971705605 proquest_journals_2094498970 pubmed_primary_29196322 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2521_16_2017 crossref_citationtrail_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2521_16_2017 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-01-17 20180117 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-01-17 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2018 text: 2018-01-17 day: 17 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Baltimore |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of neuroscience |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurosci |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
Publisher_xml | – name: Society for Neuroscience |
References | 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.12 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.34 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.11 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.33 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.10 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.32 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.31 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.30 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.6 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.7 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.8 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.9 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.29 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.1 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.28 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.2 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.27 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.3 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.4 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.25 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.5 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.24 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.23 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.22 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.21 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.20 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.19 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.18 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.17 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.16 Pascual-Marqui (2023041803285653000_38.3.586.26) 2002; 24 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.15 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.14 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.36 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.13 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.35 |
References_xml | – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.28 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_19 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.25 doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.2 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2759-09.2009 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.9 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.074 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.6 doi: 10.3233/RNN-140411 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.10 doi: 10.1126/science.1179867 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.15 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1414-13.2013 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.18 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0600-15.2015 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.24 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.027 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.12 doi: 10.1177/1073858416631966 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.30 doi: 10.1126/science.1179850 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.36 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.34 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00131 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.22 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.027 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.5 doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.398 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.3 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0868-16.2016 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.29 doi: 10.1002/hbm.20367 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.19 doi: 10.1016/S0079-6107(96)00009-0 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.32 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.038 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.8 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj008 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.7 doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1328-4 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.20 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318750111 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.14 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0978-11.2011 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.33 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.023 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.21 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.001 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.004 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.31 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129163 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.16 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.23 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.016 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.13 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.35 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002032 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.11 doi: 10.1038/35094565 – volume: 24 start-page: 5 year: 2002 ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.26 article-title: Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details, Methods Find publication-title: Exp. Clin. Pharmacol – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.17 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3763-12.2013 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.4 doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.042 – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.27 doi: 10.1002/hbm.20998 |
SSID | ssj0007017 |
Score | 2.3729086 |
Snippet | In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 586 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Cortex (motor) EEG Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Excitability Exploitation Female Humans Low currents Magnetic fields Male Middle Aged Motor Cortex - physiology Motor evoked potentials Motors Pyramidal Cells - physiology Pyramidal tracts Random noise Subgroups Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods Transcranial magnetic stimulation Young Adult |
Title | A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196322 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2094498970 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1971705605 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6596189 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKeOEFAeMSGMhIiJctW-I4Fz9WVacxShkik_oWEsfRIm0JWlMQ-_Wc46RuwioxeImq3Nz2-3x8bJ_zHULeKXASZBZhrlOobO4p6HMwjNsiUmkRZnlW6MWcT_Pg5JyfLvzFaPSzn13SZIfyZmteyf-gCucAV8yS_QdkzUvhBHwGfOEICMPxThiP0UbpwQOm2PYU1SBS2RpNXGX9kerYdD0cSTjg4vhUl70pJXiZ5VVXums_XoGxRS90hiPbvhbsyNtS9cu-97rJI9MebE8L09BjUjco793FklzWmz2OCvcIShNEaYaDs3SJmZ2qaQMLdM2Am9I8eFZfY2mh9oVYI6nuL1S4GCNnt3mZa9vK9GZOSyW15VxnkL2oRzyvZ139VjX7ltX3tfrE6RyDH79OPhwy8ElsFwNQuvYHMtvzz8nx-WyWxNNFfI_cB5IyrPnx8ctGZj50dKlm8-261HJo52h7K0Ov5tZU5c-I254LEz8iDzvk6Lgl0mMyUtUTsjuu0qa--kXfUx0NrLdZdsm3MQVuHdABsw5oj1e0zyu65hXt8YpqXtGmpppXdMCrpyQ-nsaTE7urxmFLzlkDv5SnuXKwuplwuAQLhCHCzOMOjN2iyBU4woylPuNBkHk8xLsj1J_kfpaD1_-M7FTAvxeESicNolxr-ac8d_PIFxK8xkgULMtlEVnEX_-ZieyU6rFgymWCM1YAITEgJAhC4gYJgmCRI_Pc91ar5a9P7K2xSrp-vYQLgnMRidCxyFtzGawudpO0UvVqmbgiRB2qwPEt8ryF1jTJBI5qjFkkHIBubkBF9-GVqrzQyu6BjwWYxMs7tPuKPNh0sj2y01yv1Gvwj5vsjebyb-M5u0g |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+New%2C+High-Efficacy%2C+Noninvasive+Transcranial+Electric+Stimulation+Tuned+to+Local+Neurodynamics&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Cottone%2C+Carlo&rft.au=Cancelli%2C+Andrea&rft.au=Pasqualetti%2C+Patrizio&rft.au=Porcaro%2C+Camillo&rft.date=2018-01-17&rft.issn=1529-2401&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.2521-16.2017&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon |