A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics

In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 586 - 594
Main Authors Cottone, Carlo, Cancelli, Andrea, Pasqualetti, Patrizio, Porcaro, Camillo, Salustri, Carlo, Tecchio, Franca
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 17.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2521-16.2017

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1–250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDS low ). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS ( p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS ( p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDS low , and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics.
AbstractList In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1-250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDS ). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS ( < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS ( = 0.096). tRNS, tIDS , and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES. This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics.
In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1-250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDSlow). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDSlow, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics.In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1-250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDSlow). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDSlow, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics.
In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1–250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDS low ). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS ( p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS ( p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDS low , and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study demonstrated that, in humans, transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), which mimics the endogenous dynamics of the target neuronal pools, effectively changes the excitability of these pools. tIDS holds promise for high-efficacy personalized neuromodulations based on individual local neurodynamics.
In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous activity of its target is capable of altering the target's excitability. In our case, the target was the primary motor cortex (M1). We identified the endogenous neurodynamics of hand M1's subgroups of pyramidal neuronal pools in each of our subjects by applying Functional Source Separation (FSS) to their EEG recordings. We then tested whether the corticospinal excitability of the hand representation under the above described stimulation, which we named transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation (tIDS), was higher than in the absence of stimulation (baseline). As a check, we compared tIDS with the most efficient noninvasive facilitatory corticospinal tES known so far, which is 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). The control conditions were as follows: (1) sham, (2) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) in the same frequency range as tIDS (1–250 Hz), and (3) a low current tIDS (tIDSlow). Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the baseline during tIDS (p < 0.001), and it was 15% during tACS (p = 0.096). tRNS, tIDSlow, and sham induced no effects. Whereas tACS did not produce an enhancement in any subject at the individual level, tIDS was successful in producing an enhancement in 8 of the 16 subjects. The results of the present proof-of-principle study showed that proper exploitation of local neurodynamics can enhance the efficacy of personalized tES.
Author Cancelli, Andrea
Salustri, Carlo
Porcaro, Camillo
Cottone, Carlo
Pasqualetti, Patrizio
Tecchio, Franca
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Carlo
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0262-1551
  surname: Cottone
  fullname: Cottone, Carlo
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrea
  surname: Cancelli
  fullname: Cancelli, Andrea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Patrizio
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5560-1979
  surname: Pasqualetti
  fullname: Pasqualetti, Patrizio
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Camillo
  surname: Porcaro
  fullname: Porcaro, Camillo
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Carlo
  surname: Salustri
  fullname: Salustri, Carlo
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Franca
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1325-5059
  surname: Tecchio
  fullname: Tecchio, Franca
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUFPGzEQhS0EKgH6F5ClXnpgg-312rFUVUJRWqiiIEF6No53Fox2bbB3g_Lv6xQatVx6sQ_zvdF7847Qvg8eEDqlZEwrVp7_WMx-3lzfTq_GrGK0oGLMCJV7aJSnqmCc0H00IkySQnDJD9FRSo-EEJmhD-iQKapEydgI3V3gBbyc4Ut3_1DMmsZZYzdneBG882uT3BrwMhqfbH6cafGsBdtHZ_Ft77qhNb0LHi8HDzXuA54Hm5kFDDHUG286Z9MJOmhMm-Dj23-Mlt9my-llMb_-fjW9mBeWc9bnANzUQJhiRBFuwdSUU8JKTsBY1dTAZPZrKsaFWJU5UqYnTHLOq1VNRXmMvr6ufRpWHdQWfB9Nq5-i60zc6GCc_nfi3YO-D2stKiXoROUFn98WxPA8QOp155KFtjUewpA0VZJKUglSZfTTO_QxDNHndDq751xNlCSZOv3b0c7Kn9tnQLwCNoaUIjQ7hBK9LVnvStbbkjUVeltyFn55J7Su_91ETuba_8l_AVpgrdc
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhac274
crossref_primary_10_3389_fncir_2018_00044
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_909421
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12111578
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_913410
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0129065722500319
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13040574
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2023_114073
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1152394
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2020_101589
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_48905_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119109
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2024_1363128
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2020_609768
crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics10070836
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_54595_z
crossref_primary_10_3389_fninf_2023_1173597
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12091179
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2025_1548478
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2024_1401068
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2019_07_023
Cites_doi 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_19
10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2759-09.2009
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.074
10.3233/RNN-140411
10.1126/science.1179867
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1414-13.2013
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0600-15.2015
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.027
10.1177/1073858416631966
10.1126/science.1179850
10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00131
10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.027
10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.398
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0868-16.2016
10.1002/hbm.20367
10.1016/S0079-6107(96)00009-0
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.038
10.1093/cercor/bhj008
10.1007/s00429-016-1328-4
10.1073/pnas.1318750111
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0978-11.2011
10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.023
10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.001
10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.004
10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129163
10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005
10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.016
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002032
10.1038/35094565
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3763-12.2013
10.1515/RNS.2011.042
10.1002/hbm.20998
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0.
Copyright Society for Neuroscience Jan 17, 2018
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0.
– notice: Copyright Society for Neuroscience Jan 17, 2018
– notice: Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7QR
7TK
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
P64
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2521-16.2017
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Animal Behavior Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
Virology and AIDS Abstracts

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1529-2401
EndPage 594
ExternalDocumentID PMC6596189
29196322
10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2521_16_2017
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
2WC
34G
39C
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAFWJ
AAJMC
AAYXX
ABBAR
ABIVO
ACGUR
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADCOW
ADHGD
AENEX
AFCFT
AFOSN
AFSQR
AHWXS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
HYE
H~9
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P0W
P2P
QZG
R.V
RHI
RPM
TFN
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YBU
YHG
YKV
YNH
YSK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7QR
7TK
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
P64
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-164ade02920904cead14102340eac9fde27322a52466b3474ade8274445bd163
ISSN 0270-6474
1529-2401
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:24:43 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 20 04:06:38 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 16:51:26 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:53:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:47:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:51 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords primary motor area
transcranial electric stimulation
Functional Source Separation (FSS)
personal/individual dynamics of neuronal activity
transcranial individual neurodynamics stimulation
EEG
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/380586-09$15.00/0.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-164ade02920904cead14102340eac9fde27322a52466b3474ade8274445bd163
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Author contributions: F.T. designed research; C.C. and A.C. performed research; C.C., A.C., P.P., C.P., and F.T. analyzed data; P.P., C.C., C.S., and F.T. wrote the paper.
ORCID 0000-0002-0262-1551
0000-0002-1325-5059
0000-0001-5560-1979
OpenAccessLink https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/38/3/586.full.pdf
PMID 29196322
PQID 2094498970
PQPubID 2049535
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6596189
proquest_miscellaneous_1971705605
proquest_journals_2094498970
pubmed_primary_29196322
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2521_16_2017
crossref_citationtrail_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2521_16_2017
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-01-17
20180117
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-01-17
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-01-17
  day: 17
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Baltimore
PublicationTitle The Journal of neuroscience
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurosci
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Society for Neuroscience
Publisher_xml – name: Society for Neuroscience
References 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.12
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.34
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.11
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.33
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.10
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.32
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.31
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.30
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.6
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.7
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.8
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.9
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.29
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.1
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.28
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.2
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.27
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.3
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.4
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.25
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.5
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.24
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.23
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.22
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.21
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.20
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.19
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.18
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.17
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.16
Pascual-Marqui (2023041803285653000_38.3.586.26) 2002; 24
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.15
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.14
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.36
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.13
2023041803285653000_38.3.586.35
References_xml – ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.28
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_19
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.25
  doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.2
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2759-09.2009
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.9
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.074
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.6
  doi: 10.3233/RNN-140411
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.10
  doi: 10.1126/science.1179867
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.15
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1414-13.2013
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.18
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0600-15.2015
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.24
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.027
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.12
  doi: 10.1177/1073858416631966
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.30
  doi: 10.1126/science.1179850
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.36
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.34
  doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00131
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.22
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.027
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.5
  doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.398
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.3
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0868-16.2016
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.29
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.20367
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.19
  doi: 10.1016/S0079-6107(96)00009-0
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.32
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.038
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.8
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj008
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.7
  doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1328-4
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.20
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318750111
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.14
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0978-11.2011
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.33
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.023
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.21
  doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.001
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.004
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.31
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129163
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.16
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.23
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.016
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.13
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.35
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002032
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.11
  doi: 10.1038/35094565
– volume: 24
  start-page: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.26
  article-title: Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details, Methods Find
  publication-title: Exp. Clin. Pharmacol
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.17
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3763-12.2013
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.4
  doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.042
– ident: 2023041803285653000_38.3.586.27
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.20998
SSID ssj0007017
Score 2.3729086
Snippet In this paper, we pose the following working hypothesis: in humans, transcranial electric stimulation (tES) with a time course that mimics the endogenous...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 586
SubjectTerms Adult
Cortex (motor)
EEG
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Excitability
Exploitation
Female
Humans
Low currents
Magnetic fields
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Cortex - physiology
Motor evoked potentials
Motors
Pyramidal Cells - physiology
Pyramidal tracts
Random noise
Subgroups
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Young Adult
Title A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196322
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2094498970
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1971705605
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6596189
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKeOEFAeMSGMhIiJctW-I4Fz9WVacxShkik_oWEsfRIm0JWlMQ-_Wc46RuwioxeImq3Nz2-3x8bJ_zHULeKXASZBZhrlOobO4p6HMwjNsiUmkRZnlW6MWcT_Pg5JyfLvzFaPSzn13SZIfyZmteyf-gCucAV8yS_QdkzUvhBHwGfOEICMPxThiP0UbpwQOm2PYU1SBS2RpNXGX9kerYdD0cSTjg4vhUl70pJXiZ5VVXums_XoGxRS90hiPbvhbsyNtS9cu-97rJI9MebE8L09BjUjco793FklzWmz2OCvcIShNEaYaDs3SJmZ2qaQMLdM2Am9I8eFZfY2mh9oVYI6nuL1S4GCNnt3mZa9vK9GZOSyW15VxnkL2oRzyvZ139VjX7ltX3tfrE6RyDH79OPhwy8ElsFwNQuvYHMtvzz8nx-WyWxNNFfI_cB5IyrPnx8ctGZj50dKlm8-261HJo52h7K0Ov5tZU5c-I254LEz8iDzvk6Lgl0mMyUtUTsjuu0qa--kXfUx0NrLdZdsm3MQVuHdABsw5oj1e0zyu65hXt8YpqXtGmpppXdMCrpyQ-nsaTE7urxmFLzlkDv5SnuXKwuplwuAQLhCHCzOMOjN2iyBU4woylPuNBkHk8xLsj1J_kfpaD1_-M7FTAvxeESicNolxr-ac8d_PIFxK8xkgULMtlEVnEX_-ZieyU6rFgymWCM1YAITEgJAhC4gYJgmCRI_Pc91ar5a9P7K2xSrp-vYQLgnMRidCxyFtzGawudpO0UvVqmbgiRB2qwPEt8ryF1jTJBI5qjFkkHIBubkBF9-GVqrzQyu6BjwWYxMs7tPuKPNh0sj2y01yv1Gvwj5vsjebyb-M5u0g
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+New%2C+High-Efficacy%2C+Noninvasive+Transcranial+Electric+Stimulation+Tuned+to+Local+Neurodynamics&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Cottone%2C+Carlo&rft.au=Cancelli%2C+Andrea&rft.au=Pasqualetti%2C+Patrizio&rft.au=Porcaro%2C+Camillo&rft.date=2018-01-17&rft.issn=1529-2401&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.2521-16.2017&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0270-6474&client=summon