Continuous time modeling of panel data: SEM versus filter techniques

Although convincing arguments have been put forward for continuous‐time modeling, its use in panel research is rare. In one approach, classical N = 1 state‐space modeling procedures are adapted for panel analysis to estimate the exact discrete model (EDM) by means of filter techniques. Based on earl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistica Neerlandica Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 4 - 28
Main Authors Oud, Johan H. L., Singer, Hermann
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2008
Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research
SeriesStatistica Neerlandica
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although convincing arguments have been put forward for continuous‐time modeling, its use in panel research is rare. In one approach, classical N = 1 state‐space modeling procedures are adapted for panel analysis to estimate the exact discrete model (EDM) by means of filter techniques. Based on earlier less satisfactory indirect methods, a more recent approach uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to get the maximum likelihood estimate of the EDM by the direct method. After an introduction into continuous‐time state‐space modeling for panel data and the EDM, a thorough comparison is made between the two distinct approaches with quite different histories by means of Monte Carlo simulation studies. The model used in the simulation studies is the damped linear oscillator with and without random subject effects.
Bibliography:ArticleID:STAN376
istex:F88E398B44BA4D71BC34A3A5542863753BF1D24A
ark:/67375/WNG-TF0T45Z7-N
hermann.singer@fernuni‐hagen.de
ISSN:0039-0402
1467-9574
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00376.x