Is it normal to be a principal mindreader? Revising theories of social cognition on the basis of schizophrenia and high functioning autism-spectrum disorders

► Schizophrenic and autistic persons cannot rely on intuitive social understanding. ► They are forced to engage in explicit mindreading as a compensatory strategy. ► But such an observational stance may further exacerbate their social impairment. ► Theories positing this stance as the main mode of n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch in developmental disabilities Vol. 34; no. 5; pp. 1376 - 1387
Main Authors Froese, Tom, Stanghellini, Giovanni, Bertelli, Marco O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► Schizophrenic and autistic persons cannot rely on intuitive social understanding. ► They are forced to engage in explicit mindreading as a compensatory strategy. ► But such an observational stance may further exacerbate their social impairment. ► Theories positing this stance as the main mode of normal sociality must be revised. ► Psychopathology points to skilled interaction as essential to normal understanding. Schizophrenia and high functioning autism-spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental conditions that mainly impair social competence, while general intelligence (IQ) is spared. Both disorders have a strong ancillary role in theoretical research on social cognition. Recently the debate has started to be inflected by embodied and phenomenological approaches, which claim that the standard portrayal of all social understanding as so-called ‘mindreading’, i.e. the attribution of mental states to others in the service of explaining and predicting their behavior, is misguided. Instead it is emphasized that we normally perceive others directly as conscious and goal-directed persons, without requiring any theorizing and/or simulation. This paper evaluates some of the implications of abnormal experiences reported by people with schizophrenia and ASD for the current debate in cognitive science. For these people the practice of explicit mindreading seems to be a compensatory strategy that ultimately fails to compensate for – and may even exacerbate – their impairment of intuitive and interactive social understanding. Phenomenological psychopathology thereby supports the emerging view that ‘mindreading’ is not the principal form of normal social understanding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0891-4222
1873-3379
DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.005