Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, safety and acceptability of Ornibel®, a new polymer composition contraceptive vaginal ring (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.00/3.474 mg) compared with Nuvaring® (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.7/2.7 mg)

• Published in: The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 429 - 438
• Main Authors: Algorta, Jaime, Diaz, Maria, de Benito, Raquel, Lefebvre, Marc, Sicard, Eric, Furtado, Milton, Regidor, Pedro Antonio, Ronchi, Celestino
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 02.11.2017; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: acceptability; Bioequivalence; burst effect; comparative bioavailability; contraceptive vaginal ring; ethinylestradiol; Etonogestrel; Pharmacokinetics; Polymers; user satisfaction; Vagina; Spain; Etonogestrel; comparative bioavailability; ethinylestradiol; contraceptive vaginal ring; burst effect; acceptability; user satisfaction
• ISSN: 1362-5187; 1473-0782; 1473-0782
• DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1413179

Objective: To show the clinical development of Ornibel ® (ExeltisHealthcare, Spain) a contraceptive vaginal ring manufactured with a new polymer composition and containing etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol, compared to Nuvaring ® (MSD, Spain). Subjects and methods: Randomised, single dose, 2-period, 2-sequence, 2-stage crossover, comparative bioavailability study conducted in 40 healthy female subjects. All subjects received both treatments for 28 days in each of two periods, separated by a 28 days washout. Ornibel ® contains etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.00/3.47 mg and Nuvaring ® contains etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.7/2.7 mg, both rings delivering 120/15 µg/day. For the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters, 37 blood samples were collected up to 840 h after each ring insertion to quantify plasma concentrations of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol using a validated MS/MS-HPLC. Safety was assessed by adverse events recording, clinical laboratory and vital signs and tolerability by vaginal examination. Acceptability was investigated by a 5-point scale questionnaire. Results: Bioequivalence was demonstrated in the first stage as the 94.12% Confidence Intervals of the primary parameters laid within the 80-125% acceptance range for both etonogestrel (C max : 96.81-112.20%; AUC 0-504h : 98.71-108.61%; AUC 0-t : 100.14-109.10%) and ethinylestradiol. (C max : 105.91-120.62%; AUC 0-504h : 105.47-114.59%; AUC 0-t : 108.31-117.61%). During the first day of use a burst effect was observed with Nuvaring ® , with significantly higher level of ethinylestradiol (C max0-24h ratio: 78.34%, 94.12CI: 73.55-83.45%). Both products were well tolerated and accepted, without significant differences between them. Conclusion: Ornibel ® is bioequivalent to Nuvaring ® in terms of efficacy, safety, tolerability and acceptability. The new polymer composition provides Ornibel ® with more stability and gradual hormonal release during the first day of use, particularly for ethinylestradiol.