Synergy-Based Sensor Reduction for Recording the Whole Hand Kinematics

Simultaneous measurement of the kinematics of all hand segments is cumbersome due to sensor placement constraints, occlusions, and environmental disturbances. The aim of this study is to reduce the number of sensors required by using kinematic synergies, which are considered the basic building block...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 21; no. 4; p. 1049
Main Authors Jarque-Bou, Néstor J., Sancho-Bru, Joaquín L., Vergara, Margarita
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI 04.02.2021
MDPI AG
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI10.3390/s21041049

Cover

More Information
Summary:Simultaneous measurement of the kinematics of all hand segments is cumbersome due to sensor placement constraints, occlusions, and environmental disturbances. The aim of this study is to reduce the number of sensors required by using kinematic synergies, which are considered the basic building blocks underlying hand motions. Synergies were identified from the public KIN-MUS UJI database (22 subjects, 26 representative daily activities). Ten synergies per subject were extracted as the principal components explaining at least 95% of the total variance of the angles recorded across all tasks. The 220 resulting synergies were clustered, and candidate angles for estimating the remaining angles were obtained from these groups. Different combinations of candidates were tested and the one providing the lowest error was selected, its goodness being evaluated against kinematic data from another dataset (KINE-ADL BE-UJI). Consequently, the original 16 joint angles were reduced to eight: carpometacarpal flexion and abduction of thumb, metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal flexion of thumb, proximal interphalangeal flexion of index and ring fingers, metacarpophalangeal flexion of ring finger, and palmar arch. Average estimation errors across joints were below 10% of the range of motion of each joint angle for all the activities. Across activities, errors ranged between 3.1% and 16.8%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s21041049