Are we overlooking persistent small airways dysfunction in community-managed asthma?

Abstract Background Whether small airways dysfunction persists in patients with asthma receiving standard community treatment is unknown. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a sensitive measure of small airways function. Objective To assess the degree of small airways dysfunction in a cross-section of pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of allergy, asthma, & immunology Vol. 109; no. 3; pp. 185 - 189.e2
Main Authors Anderson, William J., MBChB, Zajda, Emma, BSc, Lipworth, Brian J., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.09.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Whether small airways dysfunction persists in patients with asthma receiving standard community treatment is unknown. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a sensitive measure of small airways function. Objective To assess the degree of small airways dysfunction in a cross-section of patients with community-managed asthma. Methods We analyzed primary care referral data from patients with persistent asthma ( n = 378) receiving standard community therapy, screened using spirometry and IOS. We compared patients by British Thoracic Society asthma treatment step (2–4). Results Step 2 patients were not different from step 3 patients receiving long-acting beta-agonist (LABA). Step 4 patients differed from step 2 by: higher inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose ( P < .0001); lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 %; P = .02) and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF25–75% ; P = .001); higher frequency of resonance (Fres ; P = .02) and peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20; P = .006); whereas for steps 3 vs 4 there were differences in Fres ( P < .05) and R5-R20 ( P = .006). There were high proportions of abnormality for R5-R20 (>0.03 kPa/L/s) at steps 2, 3, and 4, respectively: 64.6%, 63.5%, and 69.9%. Step 2 patients receiving extra-fine particle ICS demonstrated lower total airway resistance at 5Hz (R5) vs patients receiving standard ICS (124.1% vs 138.3%, P < .05), with no difference in FEV1 . At step 4, R5 remained elevated at 141.3% despite concomitant LABA, with only 2.4% using extra-fine ICS. Conclusion Persistent small airways dysfunction occurs despite treatment at steps 2 through 4 of current asthma guidelines. Extra-fine ICS may reduce airway resistance at step 2. Prospective studies with extra-fine ICS ± LABA at steps 2 through 4 are required to discern whether improving small airways function might result in long-term improved control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1081-1206
1534-4436
DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2012.06.022