AbortionChangesYou: A Case Study to Understand the Communicative Tensions in Women's Medication Abortion Narratives

One out of four women in the United States will have an abortion by age 45. While abortion rates are steadily declining in the United States, the rate of medication abortions continues to increase, with 39% of all abortions being medication abortions. Our study is one of the first to analyze women&#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth communication Vol. 36; no. 12; pp. 1485 - 1494
Main Authors Rafferty, Katherine A., Longbons, Tessa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Routledge 15.10.2021
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:One out of four women in the United States will have an abortion by age 45. While abortion rates are steadily declining in the United States, the rate of medication abortions continues to increase, with 39% of all abortions being medication abortions. Our study is one of the first to analyze women's narratives after having had a medication abortion. Using relational dialectics theory, we conducted a case study of the nonpartisan website, Abortion Changes You. Our contrapuntal analysis rendered four sites of dialectical tension found across women's blog posts: only choice vs. other alternatives, unprepared vs. knowledgeable, relief vs. regret, and silence vs. openness. Each site of struggle characterized a different noteworthy moment within a woman's medication abortion experience: the decision, the medication abortion process, identity after abortion, and managing the stigmatizing silence before and after the abortion. We discuss theoretical and practical implications about how the larger politicized discourses prevalent within the abortion debate impact the liminality of women who are contemplating a medication abortion and affect their own narrative construction about the medication abortion experience.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1041-0236
1532-7027
DOI:10.1080/10410236.2020.1770507