Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a multicenter cohort study

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement in the prevention of recurrent preterm birth. Study Design We conducted a multicenter cohort study with retrospective Dutch (32 patients) and Boston (34 patients) cohorts who had underg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 207; no. 4; pp. 273.e1 - 273.e12
Main Authors Burger, Nicole B., MD, Einarsson, Jon I., MD, MPH, Brölmann, Henricus A.M., MD, Vree, Florentien E.M., MD, McElrath, Thomas F., MD, PhD, Huirne, Judith A.F., MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.10.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement in the prevention of recurrent preterm birth. Study Design We conducted a multicenter cohort study with retrospective Dutch (32 patients) and Boston (34 patients) cohorts who had undergone preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement. Eligible patients had at least 1 second/third trimester fetal loss or delivered at <34 weeks of gestation because of cervical insufficiency and/or a short or absent cervix. Primary outcome was delivery of an infant at ≥34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival. Secondary outcome measures included surgical and pregnancy outcomes and patients' satisfaction (Dutch cohort). Results Surgical outcomes of 66 patients were excellent, with 3 minor complications. After preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage, 35 pregnancies were evaluated. Twenty-five patients (71.4%) delivered at ≥34 weeks of gestation; 3 patients (8.6%) experienced a second-trimester fetal loss. The total fetal survival rate was 90.0%. Conclusion Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage shows encouraging and favorable perinatal outcomes in patients with a poor obstetric history.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.030