Influence of water to solid ratio on mechanical properties of GBFS-based geopolymer foam concrete

The development of sustainable building materials with reduced environmental footprint in both, manufacturing and operational phases of the material lifecycle, is attracting increased interest in the construction industry worldwide. A recent innovation, the geopolymer foam concrete, combines the per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMATEC Web of Conferences Vol. 163; p. 6003
Main Authors Piotrowski, Tomasz, Prochoń, Piotr
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published Les Ulis EDP Sciences 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The development of sustainable building materials with reduced environmental footprint in both, manufacturing and operational phases of the material lifecycle, is attracting increased interest in the construction industry worldwide. A recent innovation, the geopolymer foam concrete, combines the performance benefits and operational energy savings achievable through the use of lightweight foam concrete, with the cradle-togate emissions reductions obtained through the use of a geopolymer binder derived from granulated blast-furnace slag (GBFS). In this study mechanical properties of GBFS-based foam concrete were investigated for samples of different water to solid ratio (0.252, 0.287 and 0.321). According to ASTM C 796-97 both mass of the foaming solution and water in sodium silicate solution was considered as part of the total amount of mixing water. As a solid part, GBFS and solid part of activators (NaOH and sodium silicate) was accounted. A group of specimens (40x40x160 beams and 100x100x100 cubes) have been prepared and volume density, bending, compressive strength tests have been performed. In a result an optimized lightweight GBFS-based geopolymer foam concrete was obtained, characterized by 1.8 kg/dm3 volume density, 2.6 MPa bending strength and 51.8 MPa compressive strength measured on beams and 44.1 MPa compressive strength on cubes.
Bibliography:scopus-id:2-s2.0-85049365290
ISSN:2261-236X
2274-7214
2261-236X
DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201816306003