Molecular and cytological examination of Calopogon (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae): circumscription, phylogeny, polyploidy, and possible hybrid speciation
The orchid genus Calopogon R.Br. (Orchidaceae), native to eastern North America and the northern Caribbean, currently contains five species and up to three varieties. Using nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA sequences, amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), chloroplast...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of botany Vol. 91; no. 5; pp. 707 - 723 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Botanical Soc America
01.05.2004
Botanical Society of America Botanical Society of America, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The orchid genus Calopogon R.Br. (Orchidaceae), native to eastern North America and the northern Caribbean, currently contains five species and up to three varieties. Using nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA sequences, amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), chloroplast DNA restriction fragments, and chromosome counts, we present a phylogenetic and taxonomic study of the genus. Calopogon multiflorus and C. pallidus are consistently sister species, but the relationships of C. barbatus, C. oklahomensis, and C. tuberosus are not as clear. In the ITS analysis C. oklahomensis is sister to C. barbatus, whereas it is sister to C. tuberosus in the plastid restriction fragment analysis. Furthermore, all species were found to have chromosome numbers of 2n = 38 and 40, with the exception of the putatively hybrid-derived C. oklahomensis with 2n = 114 and 120. The hexaploidy of the latter, plus the discrepancy in its position between the ITS and plastid restriction fragment trees, could suggest that it is of hybrid origin. However, the presence of unique morphological and molecular characters might indicate that it is either an ancient hybrid or not of hybrid derivation at all. Finally, using these molecular methods all taxa appear to generally be discrete groups, with the exception of C. tuberosus vars. latifolius and tuberosus, the former of which is best combined with the latter. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://www.amjbot.org/ material; Todd Barkman, Javier Francisco‐Ortega, Javier Fuertes‐Aguilar, Hobbes Goldman, and Dorsett Trapnell for valuable discussions about this project; and Scott LaGreca, Tanya Livshultz, Robert Dressler, and an anonymous reviewer for evaluating earlier versions of this manuscript. This research was partially funded through the support of a National Science Foundation (USA) doctoral dissertation grant (DEB‐9623476), a research award from the American Orchid Society, two Sigma Xi grants‐in‐aid of research, the Dept. of Botany at the University of Texas, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and the Doug Goldman fund for The authors thank Tony Cox, Anette de Bruijn, Carolyn Ferguson, Megan Helfgott, Jeffrey Joseph, Javier Francisco‐Ortega, Stuart Reichler, and Yoriko Uozumi for valuable assistance and advice in molecular lab work; Lynda Hanson and Margaret Johnson for assistance with cytological studies; the numerous individuals and organizations who permitted or assisted in fieldwork in eastern North America and the Bahamas; James Ackerman and Victoria Sosa for assistance in obtaining some plant material to determine appropriate outgroups within Arethuseae; Carson Whitlow and Robert Yanetti for hybrid Calopogon research. This work represents portions of one chapter of a doctoral dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. dgoldman@fas.harvard.edu Present address: Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA. E‐mail |
ISSN: | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
DOI: | 10.3732/ajb.91.5.707 |