Lenalidomide as immune adjuvant to a dendritic cell vaccine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
Objectives We previously showed that immunization with ex vivo‐ generated autologous dendritic cells loaded with apoptotic tumor cells (Apo‐DC) potentiated tumor‐specific immunity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Here, we evaluated safety and immunogenicity of Apo‐DC in combination wi...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of haematology Vol. 101; no. 1; pp. 68 - 77 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.07.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives
We previously showed that immunization with ex vivo‐ generated autologous dendritic cells loaded with apoptotic tumor cells (Apo‐DC) potentiated tumor‐specific immunity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Here, we evaluated safety and immunogenicity of Apo‐DC in combination with lenalidomide, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF), and low‐dose cyclophosphamide (CTX).
Methods
Ten previously untreated patients with slowly progressing CLL received 5 Apo‐DC vaccinations and lenalidomide orally for 24 weeks either alone (cohort I, n = 5) or together with subcutaneous GM‐CSF and intravenous CTX (cohort II, n = 5). Tumor‐specific T‐cell responses were measured by proliferation and IFN‐γ ELISPOT assays. Immune monitoring was performed by flow cytometry.
Results
Dose‐limiting toxicity was observed in 3/10 patients, 2 in cohort I and one in cohort II. One patient developed autoimmune hemolytic anemia and another grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Vaccine‐induced immune responses were seen in 5/5 and 4/5 patients in cohort I and II, respectively. The expression of immune checkpoints on T cells did not change significantly.
Conclusions
Lenalidomide alone or in combination with GM‐CSF and low‐dose CTX as immune adjuvant to the Apo‐DC vaccine elicited tumor‐specific T‐cell responses in CLL patients. However, unexpected toxicity was observed and caution is suggested in further exploring this drug as immune adjuvant in CLL. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information This work was supported by grants from The Swedish Cancer Society, The Cancer Society in Stockholm, King Gustav V Jubilee Fund, The Cancer and Allergy Foundation, StratCan Karolinska Institutet, The Karolinska Institutet Foundations, The Stockholm County Council, AFA Insurance, The Swedish Society of Medicine and Celgene Inc. |
ISSN: | 0902-4441 1600-0609 1600-0609 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ejh.13065 |