The determinants of employee absenteeism: An empirical test of a causal model
LISREL estimates of the parameters of a causal model of absenteeism are reported for a sample of 425 full‐time employees of a 327‐bed medical centre. The model modifies and extends the conceptual framework of Steers & Rhodes (1978) and includes routinization, centralization, pay, distributive ju...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Occupational Psychology Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 1 - 19 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.1989
Cambridge University Press British Psychological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | LISREL estimates of the parameters of a causal model of absenteeism are reported for a sample of 425 full‐time employees of a 327‐bed medical centre. The model modifies and extends the conceptual framework of Steers & Rhodes (1978) and includes routinization, centralization, pay, distributive justice, work involvement, role ambiguity, conflict and overload, kinship responsibility, organizational permissiveness, job satisfaction, job involvement, organizational commitment, health status and alcohol involvement as the determinants of absenteeism. Based on self‐report measures of absence frequency, significant positive direct effects of kinship responsibility, organizational permissiveness, role ambiguity and alcohol involvement, and negative direct effects of centralization, pay and job satisfaction yielded an R2 for absenteeism of 21.6. Job satisfaction completely mediated the effects of routinization and work involvement, and partially mediated the effects of centralization and role ambiguity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-ZG7BLCMQ-M This article is based on the first author's dissertation in Hospital and Health Administration at the University of Iowa which was performed under the guidance of James Price. The research was carried out under the auspices of the US Army Long Term Civilian Training Program. Opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the authors and do not reflect an official position of the Department of Defense. Portions of the material reported here were presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, 1986. istex:9457314E22E2C907CCF219E3E8AC351508D97AFA ArticleID:JOOP473 |
ISSN: | 0305-8107 0963-1798 2044-8325 2056-8142 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1989.tb00473.x |