Clinical evaluation of BCL-2/XL levels pre- and post- HER2-targeted therapy
Our previous pre-clinical work defined BCL-2 induction as a critical component of the adaptive response to lapatinib-mediated inhibition of HER2. To determine whether a similar BCL-2 upregulation occurs in lapatinib-treated patients, we evaluated gene expression within tumor biopsies, collected befo...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 16; no. 5; p. e0251163 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
01.05.2021
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Our previous pre-clinical work defined BCL-2 induction as a critical component of the adaptive response to lapatinib-mediated inhibition of HER2. To determine whether a similar BCL-2 upregulation occurs in lapatinib-treated patients, we evaluated gene expression within tumor biopsies, collected before and after lapatinib or trastuzumab treatment, from the TRIO-B-07 clinical trial (NCT#00769470). We detected BCL2 mRNA upregulation in both HER2+/ER- as well as HER2+/ER+ patient tumors treated with lapatinib or trastuzumab. To address whether mRNA expression correlated with protein expression, we evaluated pre- and post-treatment tumors for BCL-2 via immunohistochemistry. Despite BCL2 mRNA upregulation within HER2+/ER- tumors, BCL-2 protein levels were undetectable in most of the lapatinib- or trastuzumab-treated HER2+/ER- tumors. BCL-2 upregulation was evident within the majority of lapatinib-treated HER2+/ER+ tumors and was often coupled with increased ER expression and decreased proliferation. Comparable BCL-2 upregulation was not observed within the trastuzumab-treated HER2+/ER+ tumors. Together, these results provide clinical validation of the BCL-2 induction associated with the adaptive response to lapatinib and support evaluation of BCL-2 inhibitors within the context of lapatinib and other HER2-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: S.A. Hurvitz Contracted Research: Ambrx Amgen Astra Zeneca Arvinas Bayer Daiichi-Sankyo Genentech/Roche Gilead GSK Immunomedics Lilly Macrogenics Novartis Pfizer OBI Pharma Pieris PUMA Radius Sanofi Seattle Genetics Dignitana Zymeworks Phoenix Molecular Designs, Ltd. Stock Options: NK Max Travel: Lilly M.F. Press Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Biocartis SA CEPHEID Clinical Care Options, LLC CME Outfitters, LLC Lilly USA, LLC Merck & Co. Puma Biotechnology Zymeworks Inc. Eli Lilly & Company Private Equity Role: TORL BIOTHERAPEUTICS LLC All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist. We have confirmed that the declared competing interests do not alter adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0251163 |