Worker versus Employer Perspectives on Safety in the Forestry Services Industry

• Published in: Journal of agromedicine Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 224 - 229
• Main Authors: de Castro, A B, Wilmsen, Carl, Post, Sara, Harrington, Marcy J, Bush, Diane
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis Ltd 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Discordance; Emigrants and Immigrants; Employers; Forestry; Hazard identification; Health hazards; Health risks; Humans; Injury prevention; Natural environment; Occupational hazards; Occupational Health; Occupational Injuries - prevention & control; Occupational safety; Safety; Safety measures; Workers; Working conditions; Workplace; minority health; work environment; Latinos; occupational health; underserved populations
• ISSN: 1059-924X; 1545-0813
• DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2089422

Forestry services work presents high risk for injury, illness, and fatality. How worker and employer views of workplace safety compare influences the strategies to address hazardous working conditions. Interviews with forestry services workers and employers revealed themes about occupational hazards and ways to prevent work-related injury. Workers identified hazards related to the social and natural environments, and injury prevention solutions focused on interventions beyond their control and based on employer responsibility. Employers characterized hazards within job task contexts and tied solutions to worker behaviors to improve job task performance. Discordance between worker and employer reports indicates inconsistent views about what safety measures should be provided and pursued to effectively reduce injury risk. Because many workers in the forest services industry are marginalized due to their immigrant documentation status and being racially/ethnically minoritized, power differentials between workers and employers can also influence how workplace safety and health measures are determined and implemented.