Spilled gallstones mimicking a retroperitoneal sarcoma following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

• Published in: World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 17; pp. 4421 - 4426
• Main Authors: Kim, Bum-Soo, Joo, Sun-Hyung, Kim, Hyun-Cheol
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 07.05.2016
• Subjects: Abscess - etiology; abscess;Spilled; Case Report; cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - adverse effects; Diagnosis, Differential; gallstone;Laparoscopic; Gallstones - complications; Gallstones - surgery; Granuloma, Foreign-Body - etiology; Humans; Intra-abdominal; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Sarcoma - diagnosis; Spilled gallstone; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Intra-abdominal abscess
• ISSN: 1007-9327; 2219-2840
• DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i17.4421

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a standard treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease. Although spilled gallstones are considered harmless, unretrieved gallstones can result in intra-abdominal abscess. We report a case of abscess formation due to spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy mimicking a retroperitoneal sarcoma on radiologic imaging. A 59-year-old male with a surgical history of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy complicated by gallstones spillage presented with a 1 mo history of constant right-sided abdominal pain and tenderness. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a retroperitoneal sarcoma at the sub-hepatic space. On open exploration a 5 cm × 5 cm retroperitoneal mass was excised. The mass contained purulent material and gallstones. Final pathology revealed abscess formation and foreign body granuloma. Vigilance concerning the possibility of lost gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is important. If possible, every spilled gallstone during surgery should be retrieved to prevent this rare complication.