Diagnostic Test Studies in Nephrology: Quantity, Quality, and Scope

• Published in: American journal of kidney diseases Vol. 58; no. 6; pp. 921 - 927
• Main Authors: McGee, Richard G., MM(Clin Epi), Neuen, Brendon L, Mitchell, Ruth L., MA, Craig, Jonathan C., PhD, Webster, Angela C., PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2011; Elsevier
• Subjects: Bibliometrics; Biological and medical sciences; diagnostic tests; Humans; Kidney Diseases - diagnosis; Medical sciences; Nephrology; Nephrology - statistics & numerical data; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases; Research - statistics & numerical data; nephrology; Bibliometrics; diagnostic tests; Nephrology; Quality; Exploration; Quantity; Diagnosis; Urology
• ISSN: 0272-6386; 1523-6838
• DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.06.019

Background Diagnostic errors represent an important cause of preventable harm in health care that may be reduced through evidence-based choice, use, and interpretation of diagnostic tests. We hypothesized that diagnostic errors are reduced through evidence-based choice, use, and interpretation of diagnostic tests. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Population Diagnostic test studies. Selection Criteria for Studies Publications from 1966-2008 retrieved from MEDLINE. Intervention The Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Outcomes Number and coverage of diagnostic studies in nephrology and methodological quality of the test accuracy subset. Results Fewer diagnostic studies were published in nephrology than other areas of internal medicine, although the proportion of total citations that were diagnostic studies (4.9% ± 2.8% [SD]) was not statistically different from other specialties ( P = 0.2). Within nephrology, some topic areas (eg, urinary tract infections) were over-represented, whereas others (eg, acute kidney injury) had relatively few diagnostic studies (range, 2.7%-12.5%). Examining the randomly selected subset of studies that were diagnostic test accuracy studies (120) showed variable quality. Ninety-seven percent (116 of 120) of studies adequately described index test procedure, but only 27% (32 of 120) adequately blinded investigators to results of index tests, and 36% (43 of 120), to results of reference tests. The quality of nephrology diagnostic test accuracy studies has not improved substantially during the past 30 years. Limitations Comparing nephrology with other specialties, some potential inequalities of scale could not be addressed, which may influence research output results across specialties. Conclusions Diagnostic research in nephrology is published less frequently than most other medical specialties. The quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies that are published is variable and leaves room for improvement.