Cost effectiveness of routine duodenal biopsies in iron deficiency anemia

• Published in: World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 34; pp. 7813 - 7823
• Main Authors: Broide, Efrat, Matalon, Shay, Kriger-Sharabi, Ofra, Richter, Vered, Shirin, Haim, Leshno, Moshe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 14.09.2016
• Subjects: Anemia, Iron-Deficiency - complications; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency - economics; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency - pathology; anemia;Cost-effectiveness;Esophagogastroduodenoscopy;Markov; Biopsy - economics; Biopsy - methods; Celiac; Celiac Disease - complications; Celiac Disease - diagnosis; Celiac Disease - economics; Celiac Disease - pathology; Cost-Benefit Analysis; deficiency; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods; disease;Iron; Duodenum - surgery; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Markov Chains; Prevalence; Proportional Hazards Models; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Serology - methods; Celiac disease; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; Markov model; Cost-effectiveness; Iron deficiency anemia
• ISSN: 1007-9327; 2219-2840
• DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7813

AIM To investigate the cost effectiveness of routine small bowel biopsies(SBBs) in patients with iron deficiency anemia(IDA) independent of their celiac disease(CD) serology test results.METHODS We used a state transition Markov model. Two strategies were compared: routine SBBs during esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD) in all patients with IDA regardless their celiac serology status(strategy A) vs SBBs only in IDA patients with positive serology(strategy B). The main outcomes were quality adjusted life years(QALY),average cost and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio(ICER). One way sensitivity analysis was performed on all variables and two way sensitivity analysis on selected variables were done. In order to validate the results,a Monte Carlo simulation of 100 sample trials with 10,and an acceptability curve were performed.RESULTS Strategy A of routine SBBs yielded 19.888 QALYs with a cost of $218.10 compared to 19.887 QALYs and $234.17 in strategy B. In terms of cost-effectiveness,strategy A was the dominant strategy,as long as the cost of SBBs stayed less than $67. In addition,the ICER of strategy A was preferable,providing the cost of biopsy stays under $77. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that strategy A yielded the same QALY but with lower costs than strategy B. CONCLUSION Our model suggests that EGD with routine SBBs is a cost-effective approach with improved QALYs in patients with IDA when the prevalence of CD is 5% or greater. SBBs should be a routine screening tool for CD among patients with IDA,regardless of their celiac antibody status.