Universal Optimality for Selected Crossover Designs

Hedayat and Yang earlier proved that balanced uniform designs in the entire class of crossover designs based on t treatments, n subjects, and p = t periods are universally optimal when n ≤ t(t - 1)/2. Surprisingly, in the class of crossover designs with t treatments and p = t periods, a balanced uni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 99; no. 466; pp. 461 - 466
Main Authors Hedayat, A. S, Yang, Min
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Alexandria, VA Taylor & Francis 01.06.2004
American Statistical Association
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0162-1459
1537-274X
DOI10.1198/016214504000000331

Cover

More Information
Summary:Hedayat and Yang earlier proved that balanced uniform designs in the entire class of crossover designs based on t treatments, n subjects, and p = t periods are universally optimal when n ≤ t(t - 1)/2. Surprisingly, in the class of crossover designs with t treatments and p = t periods, a balanced uniform design may not be universally optimal if the number of subjects exceeds t(t - 1)/2. This article, among other results, shows that (a) a balanced uniform design is universally optimal in the entire class of crossover designs withp = t as long as n is not greater than t(t + 2)/2 and 3 ≤ t ≤ 12; (b) a balanced uniform design with n = 2t, t ≥ 3, and p =t is universally optimal in the entire class of crossover designs with n = 2t and p = t; and (c) for the case where p ≤ t, the design suggested by Stufken is universally optimal, thus completing Kushner's result that a Stufken design is universally optimal if n is divisible by t(p - 1).
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0162-1459
1537-274X
DOI:10.1198/016214504000000331