Are managerial pressure, technological control and intrinsic motivation effective in improving data quality?

Can data collectors be “pushed” into collecting high quality data or would being “pulled” be more effective? This paper finds that managers should be careful of the degree to which “push” factors, such as managerial pressure and technological input control, are relied upon. While they may be helpful...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReliability engineering & system safety Vol. 119; pp. 26 - 34
Main Authors Molina, Roger, Unsworth, Kerrie, Hodkiewicz, Melinda, Adriasola, Elisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Can data collectors be “pushed” into collecting high quality data or would being “pulled” be more effective? This paper finds that managers should be careful of the degree to which “push” factors, such as managerial pressure and technological input control, are relied upon. While they may be helpful for motivating those data collectors who are not intrinsically motivated, they are either not helpful or may discourage those data collectors who are intrinsically motivated. Instead, self-concordance may act as a longer-term, more stable approach to increasing the motivation of data collectors and thus increasing the quality of data that enter reliability systems. This study uses a sequential mixed-method approach involving interviews with 20 data collectors and a quantitative survey of 109 data collectors in a water utility. It examines the interactive effect of managerial pressure, technological input control and self-concordance on data collection performance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0951-8320
1879-0836
DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2013.04.009