A comparative study of internal fixation and prosthesis replacement for radial head fractures of Mason type III

• Published in: International orthopaedics Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 249 - 253
• Main Authors: Ruan, Hong-Jiang, Fan, Cun-Yi, Liu, Jun-Jian, Zeng, Bing-fang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.02.2009
• Subjects: Adult; Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation; Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods; Artificial Limbs; Bone Cements; Bone Screws; Bone Wires; Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging; Elbow Joint - physiology; Elbow Joint - surgery; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Humans; Internal Fixators; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Paper; Orthopedics; Radiography; Radius Fractures - classification; Radius Fractures - diagnostic imaging; Radius Fractures - surgery; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology; Treatment Outcome; Radial Head; Radial Head Fracture; Annular Ligament; Cannulated Screw; Prosthetic Replacement
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0453-3

Although several treatment options for radial head fractures are available, no clear solutions exist. In this study we therefore compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement in treatment of radial head fractures of Mason type III. Cement stem and bipolar radial prosthesis were used to treat 12 fresh cases and two old cases of Mason type III radial head fracture. As a control group, another eight cases of radial head type III fracture were treated with ORIF with cannulated screws and Kirschner (K) wires. The 14 patients who received radial head prosthesis replacement were followed-up for 15.9 months (range 10–27 months). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, we found excellent results in nine cases, good in four, and fair in one. Mean follow-up of the eight cases in the ORIF group was 14 months (range 10–21 months), with good results in one case, fair in four, and poor in three. The result was good or excellent in 92.9% of prosthesis replacement patients and in 12.5% of ORIF patients. This difference is statistically significant ( P  = 0.0004; Fisher’s exact test). We concluded that bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement is better than ORIF in treatment of Mason type III radial head fracture.