Development of Nonpulmonary Vein Foci Increases Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Abstract Objectives The aim of this paper was to clarify the impact of nonpulmonary vein foci (NPVF) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Background NPVF are considered contributing factors for the recurrence of AF after PV isolation, but their exact role remai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJACC. Clinical electrophysiology Vol. 3; no. 6; pp. 547 - 555
Main Authors Hojo, Rintaro, MD, Fukamizu, Seiji, MD, Kitamura, Takeshi, MD, Aomyama, Yuya, MD, PhD, Nishizaki, Mitsuhiro, MD, PhD, Kobayashi, Yoichi, MD, PhD, Sakurada, Harumizu, MD, PhD, Hiraoka, Masayasu, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objectives The aim of this paper was to clarify the impact of nonpulmonary vein foci (NPVF) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Background NPVF are considered contributing factors for the recurrence of AF after PV isolation, but their exact role remains unclear. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients (paroxysmal AF, n = 172; persistent AF, n = 44) who underwent a second electrophysiological study 6 months after the original PV isolation. Patients with AF recurrence underwent additional ablation procedures for reconnected PV and NPVF. NPVF were detected in the control group and with drug infusion (isoproterenol or isoproterenol with adenosine triphosphate) during the first and second procedure. NPVF detected for the first time in the second session were defined as newly developed, and their effect on AF recurrence after the second procedure was investigated, along with the predictive factors for NPVF development. Results Patients with AF recurrence after the first session had a significantly higher reconnected PV (91.5% vs. 68.2% in patients without recurrence). NPVF were detected in 20 and 54 patients in the first and second sessions, respectively. Patients with newly developed NPVF had a significantly higher AF recurrence (24.1% vs. 7.4% in patients without newly developed NPVF). Newly developed NPVF and AF recurrence after the first session were independent predictors for AF recurrence after the second procedure, whereas AF history and NPVF in the first session were independent predictors for newly developed NPVF. Conclusions NPVF detection and ablation may represent important therapeutic options to prevent AF recurrence, especially in patients who require repeated procedures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2405-500X
2405-5018
DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2016.12.008