Penetration of the convection and overshielding electric fields to the equatorial ionosphere during a quasiperiodic DP 2 geomagnetic fluctuation event

The convection electric field penetrates to the equatorial ionosphere with no significant shielding during DP 2 fluctuation events with periods of 30–60 min (Nishida, 1968) and even during the main phase of a storm that continues over several hours (Huang et al., 2007). On the other hand, shielding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Vol. 115; no. A5
Main Authors Kikuchi, T., Ebihara, Y., Hashimoto, K. K., Kataoka, R., Hori, T., Watari, S., Nishitani, N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2010
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The convection electric field penetrates to the equatorial ionosphere with no significant shielding during DP 2 fluctuation events with periods of 30–60 min (Nishida, 1968) and even during the main phase of a storm that continues over several hours (Huang et al., 2007). On the other hand, shielding becomes effective in 20 min during the substorm growth phase (Somayajulu et al., 1987), and in 1 h during the main phase of a storm (Kikuchi et al., 2008a). To clarify the relative contributions of the convection and shielding electric fields at middle to equatorial latitudes, we analyzed an equatorial DP 2 fluctuation event of 30 min duration, using magnetometer data, Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) convection maps, and electric potentials calculated with the comprehensive ring current model (CRCM). The equatorial DP 2 fluctuations were found to be caused by alternating eastward electrojets (e‐EJ) and westward electrojets (w‐EJ) in the equatorial ionosphere, which were caused by the southward and northward interplanetary magnetic field, respectively. Using the SuperDARN convection map, we further show that the e‐EJ is associated with large‐scale two‐cell convection vortices, while the w‐EJ accompanies reverse flow vortices equatorward of the two‐cell vortices. With the aid of the CRCM, we suggest that the reverse flow vortices were associated with the region 2 field‐aligned currents (R2 FACs) that caused overshielding at the equator. We think it reasonable that the overshielding electric field could appear at middle to equatorial latitudes irrespective of the period of fluctuations as the region 1 FACs decrease their intensity. This scenario well explains both DP 2 fluctuations with periods of 30–60 min and continuous penetration for several hours during the main phase of storms.
Bibliography:istex:FAC12B5C7D9BEFDB7AAF75FF20DBEE7A1425151E
Tab-delimited Table 1.
ArticleID:2008JA013948
ark:/67375/WNG-47BWBFZ8-P
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9380
2156-2202
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2008JA013948