Evapotranspiration, crop coefficient and water use efficiency of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu.) in a Mediterranean environment

• Published in: Global change biology. Bioenergy Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 811 - 819
• Main Authors: Triana, Federico, Nassi o Di Nasso, Nicoletta, Ragaglini, Giorgio, Roncucci, Neri, Bonari, Enrico
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2015
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Agronomy; Arundo donax; Biomass; Biomass energy production; Corn; crop water use; Crops; Efficiency; energy crops; Evapotranspiration; Lignocellulose; lignocellulosic biomass; lysimeter; Lysimeters; Miscanthus; perennial rhizomatous grasses; Renewable energy; Seasons; Studies; Sustainability; water requirement; Water stress; Water use; Water use efficiency; WUE; Italy; Europe; MED; MED, Italy
• ISSN: 1757-1693; 1757-1707
• DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12172

Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu.) are two perennial rhizomatous grasses (PRGs), considered as promising sources of lignocellulosic biomass for renewable energy production. Although the agronomic performance of these species has been addressed by several studies, the literature dedicated to the crop water use of giant reed and miscanthus is still limited. Our objective was thus to investigate giant reed and miscanthus water use by assessing crop evapotranspiration (ETc), crop coefficients (Kc) and water use efficiency (WUE). The study was carried out in central Italy and specifically designed water‐balance lysimeters were used to investigate the water use of these PRGs during the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons. Giant reed showed the highest cumulative evapotranspiration, with an average consumption of approximately 1100 mm, nearly 20% higher than miscanthus (900 mm). Crop evapotranspiration rates differed significantly between the species, particularly during the midseason (from June to September), when average daily ETc was 7.4 and 6.2 mm in giant reed and miscanthus respectively. The Kc values determined in our study varied from 0.4 to 1.9 for giant reed and 0.3 to 1.6 for miscanthus. Finally, WUE was higher in miscanthus than in giant reed, with average values of 4.2 and 3.1 g L−1 respectively. Further studies concerning water use under nonoptimal water conditions should be carried out and an assessment of the response to water stress of both crops is necessary to integrate the findings from this study.