Patient preferences for facial sunscreens: A split-face, randomized, blinded trial

Background Sunscreen use is a widely accepted method of primary prevention against skin cancer, sunburn, and photoaging. However, many people do not routinely apply sunscreen because they find application objectionable. Objective To determine which types of sunscreen subjects are willing to use on m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. 67 - 72
Main Authors Solky, Benjamin A., MD, Phillips, P. Kim, MD, Christenson, Leslie J., MD, Weaver, Amy L., MS, Roenigk, Randall K., MD, Otley, Clark C., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.07.2007
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Sunscreen use is a widely accepted method of primary prevention against skin cancer, sunburn, and photoaging. However, many people do not routinely apply sunscreen because they find application objectionable. Objective To determine which types of sunscreen subjects are willing to use on more than one occasion. Methods A split-face, randomized, blinded trial of commercially available sunscreens was performed among 139 community members in Rochester, Minnesota. Results Subjects were significantly more likely to indicate that they would use alcohol-based spray sunscreen again than two of the seven sunscreens assessed ( P < .05). This sunscreen was endorsed as being less greasy, less likely to leave a film, and less likely to leave them feeling hot and sweaty than at least two of the other sunscreens. Limitations Only a representative selection of commonly available sunscreens was tested. Conclusion An alcohol-based spray formulation of sunscreen was rated more favorable. Recommendations to use alcohol-based spray sunscreens may increase patient compliance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0190-9622
1097-6787
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.003