Not Only Top-Down: The Dual-Processing of Gender-Emotion Stereotypes

Is gender-emotion stereotype a “one-hundred percent” top-down processing phenomenon, or are there additional contributions to cognitive processing from background clues when they are related to stereotypes? In the present study, we measured the gender-emotion stereotypes of 57 undergraduates with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 1042
Main Authors Zhu, Wen-long, Fang, Ping, Xing, Hui-lin, Ma, Yan, Yao, Mei-lin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 26.05.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Is gender-emotion stereotype a “one-hundred percent” top-down processing phenomenon, or are there additional contributions to cognitive processing from background clues when they are related to stereotypes? In the present study, we measured the gender-emotion stereotypes of 57 undergraduates with a face recall task and found that, regardless of whether the emotional expressions of distractors were congruent or incongruent with targets, people tended to misperceive the fearful faces of men as angry and the angry faces of women as fearful. In particular, there was a significantly larger effect in the distractor-incongruent condition. The revised process-dissociation procedure analysis confirmed that both automatic and controlled processing have their own independent effects on gender-emotion stereotypes. This finding supports a dual-processing perspective on stereotypes and contributes to future research in both theory and methodology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Vivian Ciaramitaro, University of Massachusetts Boston, United States; Jason Deska, Ryerson University, Canada
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Pietro Spataro, Mercatorum University, Italy
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01042