Identifying Qualitative Between-Subject and Within-Subject Variability: A Method for Clustering Regime-Switching Dynamics

Technological advancement provides an unprecedented amount of high-frequency data of human dynamic processes. In this paper, we introduce an approach for characterizing qualitative between and within-subject variability from quantitative changes in the multi-subject time-series data. We present the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 1136
Main Authors Ou, Lu, Andrade, Alejandro, Alberto, Rosa A., Bakker, Arthur, Bechger, Timo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 04.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Technological advancement provides an unprecedented amount of high-frequency data of human dynamic processes. In this paper, we introduce an approach for characterizing qualitative between and within-subject variability from quantitative changes in the multi-subject time-series data. We present the statistical model and examine the strengths and limitations of the approach in potential applications using Monte Carlo simulations. We illustrate its usage in characterizing clusters of dynamics with phase transitions with real-time hand movement data collected on an embodied learning platform designed to foster mathematical learning.Technological advancement provides an unprecedented amount of high-frequency data of human dynamic processes. In this paper, we introduce an approach for characterizing qualitative between and within-subject variability from quantitative changes in the multi-subject time-series data. We present the statistical model and examine the strengths and limitations of the approach in potential applications using Monte Carlo simulations. We illustrate its usage in characterizing clusters of dynamics with phase transitions with real-time hand movement data collected on an embodied learning platform designed to foster mathematical learning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Rubén Maneiro, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Spain; Peida Zhan, Zhejiang Normal University, China
Edited by: Pietro Cipresso, Italian Auxological Institute (IRCCS), Italy
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01136