Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”
Bastin et al .’s estimate (Reports, 5 July 2019, p. 76) that tree planting for climate change mitigation could sequester 205 gigatonnes of carbon is approximately five times too large. Their analysis inflated soil organic carbon gains, failed to safeguard against warming from trees at high latitudes...
Saved in:
Published in | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) Vol. 366; no. 6463 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Web Resource |
Language | English |
Published |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
18.10.2019
NLM (Medline) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Bastin
et al
.’s estimate (Reports, 5 July 2019, p. 76) that tree planting for climate change mitigation could sequester 205 gigatonnes of carbon is approximately five times too large. Their analysis inflated soil organic carbon gains, failed to safeguard against warming from trees at high latitudes and elevations, and considered afforestation of savannas, grasslands, and shrublands to be restoration. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | scopus-id:2-s2.0-85073630730 |
ISSN: | 0036-8075 1095-9203 1095-9203 |
DOI: | 10.1126/science.aay7976 |