Dynamic CT but Not Optimized Multiphase CT Angiography Accurately Identifies CT Perfusion Target Mismatch Ischemic Stroke Patients
Imaging protocols for acute ischemic stroke varies significantly from center to center leading to challenges in research translation. We aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of collateral grading systems derived from dynamic computed tomography angiography (CTA) and an optimized multiphase CT...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in neurology Vol. 10; p. 1130 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
23.10.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Imaging protocols for acute ischemic stroke varies significantly from center to center leading to challenges in research translation. We aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of collateral grading systems derived from dynamic computed tomography angiography (CTA) and an optimized multiphase CTA and, to analyze the association of the two CTA modalities with CT perfusion (CTP) compartments by comparing the accuracy of dynamic CTA (dCTA) and optimized multiphase CTA (omCTA) in identifying CT perfusion (CTP) target mismatch patients. Acute ischemic stroke patients with a proximal large vessel occlusion who underwent whole brain CTP were included in the study. Collateral status were assessed using ASPECTS collaterals (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score on Collaterals) and ASITN/SIR collateral system (the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology) on dCTA and omCTA. Eighty-one patients were assessed, with a median ischemic core volume of 29 mL. The collateral assessment with ASPECTS collaterals using dCTA have a similar inter-rater agreement (K-alpha: 0.71) compared to omCTA (K-alpha: 0.69). However, the agreement between dCTA and CTP in classifying patients with target mismatch was higher compared to omCTA (Kappa, dCTA: 0.81; omCTA: 0.64). We found dCTA was more accurate than omCTA in identifying target mismatch patients with proximal large vessel occlusion. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Emmanuel Carrera, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland Reviewed by: Wengui Yu, University of California, Irvine, United States; Benjamin B. Clissold, Monash University, Australia This article was submitted to Stroke, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology |
ISSN: | 1664-2295 1664-2295 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fneur.2019.01130 |