Graded exercise stress tests in angiographically documented coronary artery disease

• Published in: Circulation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 348 - 356
• Main Authors: Bartel, A G, Behar, V S, Peter, R H, Orgain, E S, Kong, Y
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.02.1974
• Subjects: Adult; Angina Pectoris - diagnosis; Angina Pectoris - drug therapy; Angiocardiography; Cardiac Catheterization; Coronary Circulation - drug effects; Coronary Disease - diagnosis; Coronary Disease - drug therapy; Coronary Vessels - drug effects; Diagnosis, Differential; Digitalis Glycosides - pharmacology; Digitalis Glycosides - therapeutic use; Electrocardiography; Exercise Test; Humans; Pain - etiology
• ISSN: 0009-7322; 1524-4539
• DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.49.2.348

Graded exercise stress tests performed on 650 consecutive patients with proven or suspected coronary disease undergoing evaluation by cardiac catheterization were correlated with clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic findings. Among 451 patients with significant coronary stenosis, 332 (74%) had interpretable stress tests and 65% of these were positive (sensitivity). The rate of "false positives" was 8%. The clinical syndrome of typical angina identified significant coronary disease in 89% of the patients, and 58% of that group had a positive exercise test defined by objective electrocardiographic criteria. Patients were not eliminated from this study because of recent digitalis ingestion. Although a higher frequency of uninterpretable exercise tests was found in this group (40%), the test results reflected more severe coronary disease. None of the patients with "false positive" tests were taking digitalis. It is concluded that recent digitalis ingestion should not be considered a contraindication for exercise stress testing. Among the patients with interpretable exercise tests, the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease correlates strongly with the frequency of positive tests (40%, 66%, and 76%, with 70% or greater occlusion of one, two or three vessels respectively). Left main coronary stenosis of 70% or greater was associated with more severe ST segment changes, inability to achieve target heart rate during stress, and a lower maximum heart rate during exercise. The angiographic occurrence of collateral vessels was related to the extent of coronary disease and was associated with a higher percentage of positive exercise tests; no protective effect of collateral circulation could be demonstrated. Patients with abnormal resting hemodynamics or left ventricular asynergy had no significant difference in the frequency of positive tests after adjustment for the angiographic severity of disease.