Random alliance networks

•We define sociologically relevant morphological indicators for alliance networks.•We propose a method to compare empirical alliance networks with a random baseline.•We scrutinize the matrimonial role of social groups as asserted by ethnological theory.•The contribution of chance is significant on m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial networks Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 394 - 405
Main Authors Roth, Camille, Gargiulo, Floriana, Bringé, Arnaud, Hamberger, Klaus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.07.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We define sociologically relevant morphological indicators for alliance networks.•We propose a method to compare empirical alliance networks with a random baseline.•We scrutinize the matrimonial role of social groups as asserted by ethnological theory.•The contribution of chance is significant on many of the 21 examined corpuses. The morphological properties of kinship and marriage alliance networks, such as circuits, are typically considered as indicators of sociological phenomena — yet, they may also be partly coincidental. To assert the contribution of chance to these morphological features, we develop a standardized method where empirical alliance networks are compared with a random baseline. We apply our framework to a variety of empirical cases and show that some corpuses are remarkably well reconstructed by our random model, while others still feature significant divergencies which may be partly connected to field-based experience. On the whole, our approach may be used to scrutinize the matrimonial role of social groups as asserted by native or ethnological theory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0378-8733
1879-2111
DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.006