Augmenting antibody response to EGF-depleting immunotherapy: Findings from a phase I trial of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab in advanced stage NSCLC

Background CIMAvax-EGF is an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-depleting immunotherapy which has shown survival benefit as a switch maintenance treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective of this trial is to establish the safety and r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 958043
Main Authors Evans, Rachel, Lee, Kelvin, Wallace, Paul K., Reid, Mary, Muhitch, Jason, Dozier, Askia, Mesa, Circe, Luaces, Patricia L., Santos-Morales, Orestes, Groman, Adrienne, Cedeno, Carlos, Cinquino, Aileen, Fisher, Daniel T., Puzanov, Igor, Opyrchal, Mateusz, Fountzilas, Christos, Dai, Tong, Ernstoff, Marc, Attwood, Kristopher, Hutson, Alan, Johnson, Candace, Mazorra, Zaima, Saavedra, Danay, Leon, Kalet, Lage, Agustin, Crombet, Tania, Dy, Grace K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 03.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background CIMAvax-EGF is an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-depleting immunotherapy which has shown survival benefit as a switch maintenance treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective of this trial is to establish the safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy for NSCLC. Methods Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive metastatic NSCLC were enrolled using a “3+3” dose-escalation design. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE V4.03. Thirteen patients (one unevaluable), the majority with PD-L1 0%, were enrolled into two dose levels of CIMAvax-EGF. Findings The combination was determined to be safe and tolerable. The recommended phase 2 dose of CIMAvax-EGF was 2.4 mg. Humoral response to CIMAvax-EGF was achieved earlier and in a greater number of patients with the combination compared to historical control. Four out of 12 evaluable patients had an objective response.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Santiago Viteri, Clínica Mi Tres Torres, Spain
This article was submitted to Thoracic Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Reviewed by: Giovanni Rossi, University of Sassari, Italy; Paul Zarogoulidis, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Greece; Clara Mayo De Las Casas, Pangaea Oncology Laboratory, Spain
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.958043