The roughness effect on the frequency of frictional sound

Dry sliding of two bodies in contact generates a wide range of effects like friction, wear, heat and sound among others. The main interest of this study is in the frequency characteristics of the generated sound. In the past, frequency spectrum and sound pressure level with relation to surface topog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTribology international Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 659 - 664
Main Authors Stoimenov, Boyko L., Maruyama, Suguru, Adachi, Koshi, Kato, Koji
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2007
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Dry sliding of two bodies in contact generates a wide range of effects like friction, wear, heat and sound among others. The main interest of this study is in the frequency characteristics of the generated sound. In the past, frequency spectrum and sound pressure level with relation to surface topography (surface roughness in particular), have been studied mainly for concentrated contacts like stylus or hemispherical tip pin on a rough surface. Studies on flat–flat contacts were mainly focused on the topography of contacting surfaces and its relation to occurrence or non-occurrence of squeal (high pitch, high sound pressure level sound) in brake systems. The present study aims to clarify the effect of surface roughness on the frequency of non-squealing frictional sound generated in dry flat–flat sliding contact. Sound was generated by the dry contact in rubbing by hand of two rectangular cross-section stainless-steel plates having similar surface roughness. The roughness of the contacting surfaces varied in the range R z = 0.8 –12.4 μm. The sound spectra had 5 peaks (P 1, P 2, P 3, P 4 and P 5) in order of increasing frequency and it was found that the peak frequency was shifted when the roughness of the rubbed surfaces changed. The first peak P 1 was most sensitive to change of surface roughness and it shifted from 3.0 to 4.5 kHz when the maximum surface roughness changed from R z = 1 0.9 to 3.4 μ m . When the surface was relatively rough, this peak was close to the first bending natural frequency of the plate at 2.377 kHz.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0301-679X
1879-2464
DOI:10.1016/j.triboint.2005.11.010