Rationale, Design, and Methods for Process Evaluation in the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration Project
Abstract Objective The cross-site process evaluation plan for the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration (CORD) project is described here. Design The CORD project comprises 3 unique demonstration projects designed to integrate multi-level, multi-setting health care and public health interventions...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of nutrition education and behavior Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 560 - 565.e1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2015
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective The cross-site process evaluation plan for the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration (CORD) project is described here. Design The CORD project comprises 3 unique demonstration projects designed to integrate multi-level, multi-setting health care and public health interventions over a 4-year funding period. Setting Three different communities in California, Massachusetts, and Texas. Participants All CORD demonstration projects targeted 2–12-year-old children whose families are eligible for benefits under Title XXI (CHIP) or Title XIX (Medicaid). Intervention(s) The CORD projects were developed independently and consisted of evidence-based interventions that aim to prevent childhood obesity. The interventions promote healthy behaviors in children by applying strategies in 4 key settings (primary care clinics, early care and education centers, public schools, and community institutions). Main Outcome Measure(s) The CORD process evaluation outlined 3 main outcome measures: reach, dose, and fidelity, on 2 levels (researcher to provider, and provider to participant). Analysis The plan described here provides insight into the complex nature of process evaluation for consortia of independently designed multi-level, multi-setting intervention studies. The process evaluation results will provide contextual information about intervention implementation and delivery with which to interpret other aspects of the program. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1499-4046 1878-2620 1708-8259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.07.002 |