Rationale, Design, and Methods for Process Evaluation in the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration Project

Abstract Objective The cross-site process evaluation plan for the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration (CORD) project is described here. Design The CORD project comprises 3 unique demonstration projects designed to integrate multi-level, multi-setting health care and public health interventions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nutrition education and behavior Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 560 - 565.e1
Main Authors Joseph, Sitara, MPH, Stevens, Andria M., MPH, Ledoux, Tracey, PhD, RD, O'Connor, Teresia M., MD, MPH, O'Connor, Daniel P., PhD, Thompson, Debbe, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2015
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective The cross-site process evaluation plan for the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration (CORD) project is described here. Design The CORD project comprises 3 unique demonstration projects designed to integrate multi-level, multi-setting health care and public health interventions over a 4-year funding period. Setting Three different communities in California, Massachusetts, and Texas. Participants All CORD demonstration projects targeted 2–12-year-old children whose families are eligible for benefits under Title XXI (CHIP) or Title XIX (Medicaid). Intervention(s) The CORD projects were developed independently and consisted of evidence-based interventions that aim to prevent childhood obesity. The interventions promote healthy behaviors in children by applying strategies in 4 key settings (primary care clinics, early care and education centers, public schools, and community institutions). Main Outcome Measure(s) The CORD process evaluation outlined 3 main outcome measures: reach, dose, and fidelity, on 2 levels (researcher to provider, and provider to participant). Analysis The plan described here provides insight into the complex nature of process evaluation for consortia of independently designed multi-level, multi-setting intervention studies. The process evaluation results will provide contextual information about intervention implementation and delivery with which to interpret other aspects of the program.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1499-4046
1878-2620
1708-8259
DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.07.002