Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Patient Specific Versus Standard Instrumentation

• Published in: Foot and ankle specialist Vol. 17; no. 1_suppl; pp. 30S - 37S
• Main Authors: Yau, James, Emmerson, Benjamin, Kakwani, Rajesh, Murty, Aradhyula N., Townshend, David N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.02.2024
• Subjects: Ankle - surgery; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle - methods; Female; Humans; Male; Osteoarthritis - surgery; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; patient-specific instrumentation; outcomes; ankle arthritis; arthroplasty
• ISSN: 1938-6400; 1938-7636
• DOI: 10.1177/19386400231179124

Background Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can now be performed using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). Advantages include the ability to preoperatively plan and reduce the number of intraoperative surgical steps. The aim of this study was to compare PSI with standard instrumentation (SI) in a nonrandomized retrospective cohort study with respect to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary aims were to compare complications, reoperations, tourniquet time, fluoroscopy time, and postoperative alignment. Methods In all, 159 patients (111 men, 48 women) undergoing a total of 168 Infinity TAA (Stryker, Memphis, TN) using PSI (Prophecy, Stryker, Memphis, TN) or SI between 2014 and 2021 were included with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The PROMs were obtained preoperatively and at 1 year, and included the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L). Coronal plane deformity correction was assessed using the midline tibiotalar angle (MTTA). Demographics, tourniquet time, and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were obtained from the hospital records. Results There were 61 TAAs in the PSI group and 107 TAAs in the SI group. There was no significant difference in total MOXFQ, AOS, or EQ-5D. There was a significantly reduced tourniquet time (PSI mean: 95.39 minutes, SI mean: 116.87 minutes, P < .001) and radiation exposure (PSI mean: 31 seconds, SI mean: 53 seconds, P < .001). Angular correction was more accurate in the PSI group (PSI mean: 1.29°, SI mean: 2.26°, P = .005). Conclusion This study supports the use of PSI to decrease operative time, reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy, improve accuracy of implantation, and improve postoperative alignment in TAA. There was a significant difference (P = .032) in favor of PSI in the walking/standing domain of the MOXFQ at 12 months but no significant difference in overall PROMs. Levels of Evidence Level III, Retrospective