Sniffing out safety: canine detection and identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection from armpit sweat

Detection dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection based on armpit sweat odor. Sweat samples were collected using cotton pads under the armpits of negative and positive human patients, confirmed by qPCR, for periods of 15–30 min. Multiple hospitals and organizations throughout Belgium partic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in medicine Vol. 10; p. 1185779
Main Authors Callewaert, Chris, Pezavant, Maria, Vandaele, Rony, Meeus, Bart, Vankrunkelsven, Ellen, Van Goethem, Phaedra, Plumacker, Alain, Misset, Benoit, Darcis, Gilles, Piret, Sonia, De Vleeschouwer, Lander, Staelens, Frank, Van Varenbergh, Kristel, Tombeur, Sofie, Ottevaere, Anouck, Montag, Ilke, Vandecandelaere, Patricia, Jonckheere, Stijn, Vandekerckhove, Linos, Tobback, Els, Wieers, Gregoire, Marot, Jean-Christophe, Anseeuw, Kurt, D’Hoore, Leen, Tuyls, Sebastiaan, De Tavernier, Brecht, Catteeuw, Julie, Lotfi, Ali, Melnik, Alexey, Aksenov, Alexander, Grandjean, Dominique, Stevens, Miguel, Gasthuys, Frank, Guyot, Hugues
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media 19.09.2023
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Detection dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection based on armpit sweat odor. Sweat samples were collected using cotton pads under the armpits of negative and positive human patients, confirmed by qPCR, for periods of 15–30 min. Multiple hospitals and organizations throughout Belgium participated in this study. The sweat samples were stored at −20°C prior to being used for training purposes. Six dogs were trained under controlled atmosphere conditions for 2–3 months. After training, a 7-day validation period was conducted to assess the dogs’ performances. The detection dogs exhibited an overall sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 98%, and an accuracy of 95%. After validation, training continued for 3 months, during which the dogs’ performances remained the same. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis revealed a unique sweat scent associated with SARS-CoV-2 positive sweat samples. This scent consisted of a wide variety of volatiles, including breakdown compounds of antiviral fatty acids, skin proteins and neurotransmitters/hormones. An acceptability survey conducted in Belgium demonstrated an overall high acceptability and enthusiasm toward the use of detection dogs for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Compared to qPCR and previous canine studies, the detection dogs have good performances in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans, using frozen sweat samples from the armpits. As a result, they can be used as an accurate pre-screening tool in various field settings alongside the PCR test.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
scopus-id:2-s2.0-85173689238
3. Good health and well-being
Reviewed by: Ingrid Friesema, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Netherlands; Anne-Lise Chaber, University of Adelaide, Australia
Edited by: Daniel Diaz, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1185779