River flow forecasting using recurrent neural networks

• Published in: Water resources management Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 143 - 161
• Main Authors: Kumar, D.N, Raju, K.S, Sathish, T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer 01.04.2004; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Catchment areas; Comparative studies; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; Forecasting; hydrologic models; Hydrology. Hydrogeology; Neural networks; River flow; River forecasting; Rivers; Stream flow; Studies; Time series; time series analysis; Training; water flow; Water resources; watershed hydrology; watersheds; India; rivers; algorithms; models; forecasting; neural networks; drainage basins; propagation; recurrent neural networks; Asia; river flows; hydrologic time series; methodology; gauging
• ISSN: 0920-4741; 1573-1650
• DOI: 10.1023/b:warm.0000024727.94701.12

Forecasting a hydrologic time series has been one of the most complicated tasks owing to the wide range of data, the uncertainties in the parameters influencing the time series and also due to the non availability of adequate data. Recently, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have become quite popular in time series forecasting in various fields. This paper demonstrates the use of ANNs to forecast monthly river flows. Two different networks, namely the feed forward network and the recurrent neural network, have been chosen. The feed forward network is trained using the conventional back propagation algorithm with many improvements and the recurrent neural network is trained using the method of ordered partial derivatives. The selection of architecture and the training procedure for both the networks are presented. The selected ANN models were used to train and forecast the monthly flows of a river in India, with a catchment area of 5189 km^sup 2^ up to the gauging site. The trained networks are used for both single step ahead and multiple step ahead forecasting. A comparative study of both networks indicates that the recurrent neural networks performed better than the feed forward networks. In addition, the size of the architecture and the training time required were less for the recurrent neural networks. The recurrent neural network gave better results for both single step ahead and multiple step ahead forecasting. Hence recurrent neural networks are recommended as a tool for river flow forecasting.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]