Establishment of Routine Clinical Indicators-Based Nomograms for Predicting the Mortality in Patients With COVID-19

This study aimed to establish and validate the nomograms to predict the mortality risk of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using routine clinical indicators. This retrospective study included a development cohort enrolled 2,119 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and a validation co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in medicine Vol. 8; p. 706380
Main Authors He, Jialin, Song, Caiping, Liu, En, Liu, Xi, Wu, Hao, Lin, Hui, Liu, Yuliang, Li, Qi, Xu, Zhi, Ren, XiaoBao, Zhang, Cheng, Zhang, Wenjing, Duan, Wei, Tian, Yongfeng, Li, Ping, Hu, Mingdong, Yang, Shiming, Xu, Yu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 18.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aimed to establish and validate the nomograms to predict the mortality risk of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using routine clinical indicators. This retrospective study included a development cohort enrolled 2,119 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and a validation cohort included 1,504 patients with COVID-19. The demographics, clinical manifestations, vital signs, and laboratory tests of the patients at admission and outcome of in-hospital death were recorded. The independent factors associated with death were identified by a forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis and used to construct the two prognostic nomograms. The nomogram 1 was a full model to include nine factors identified in the multivariate logistic regression and nomogram 2 was built by selecting four factors from nine to perform as a reduced model. The nomogram 1 and nomogram 2 showed better performance in discrimination and calibration than the Multilobular infiltration, hypo-Lymphocytosis, Bacterial coinfection, Smoking history, hyper-Tension and Age (MuLBSTA) score in training. In validation, nomogram 1 performed better than nomogram 2 for calibration. We recommend the application of nomogram 1 in general hospitals which provide robust prognostic performance though more cumbersome; nomogram 2 in the out-patient, emergency department, and mobile cabin hospitals, which depend on less laboratory examinations to make the assessment more convenient. Both the nomograms can help the clinicians to identify the patients at risk of death with routine clinical indicators at admission, which may reduce the overall mortality of COVID-19.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Monica Catarina Botelho, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Portugal
Reviewed by: Lu Ke, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, China; Chong Qiao, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, China
This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases - Surveillance, Prevention and Treatment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.706380