Patient-reported outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review

• Published in: European journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 71; pp. 95 - 108
• Main Authors: King, Madeleine T, Winters, Zoë E, Olivotto, Ivo A, Spillane, Andrew J, Chua, Boon H, Saunders, Christobel, Westenberg, A. Helen, Mann, G. Bruce, Burnett, Petrina, Butow, Phyllis, Rutherford, Claudia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2017; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Anxiety; Anxiety - etiology; Body Image; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - psychology; Breast Neoplasms - therapy; Cancer; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - psychology; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy; Carcinoma, intraductal, noninfiltrating; Clinical outcomes; Complications; Depression; Diagnosis; Fatigue; Fatigue - etiology; Female; Health Status; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine; Humans; Invasiveness; Mental depression; Norms; Pain; Patient outcome assessment; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patients; Quality of Life; Self image; Sexuality; Stress, psychological; Stress, Psychological - etiology; Surgery; Systematic review; Patient outcome assessment; Pain; Body image; Sexuality; Stress, psychological; Depression; Anxiety; Carcinoma, intraductal, noninfiltrating; Quality of life
• ISSN: 0959-8049; 1879-0852
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.035

Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive breast cancer with excellent prognosis but with potential adverse impacts of diagnosis and treatment on quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We undertook a systematic review to synthesise current evidence about PROs following diagnosis and treatment for DCIS. We searched five electronic databases (from database inception to November 2015), cross-referenced and contacted experts to identify studies that reported PROs after DCIS treatment. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and quality criteria, and extracted findings. Of 2130 papers screened, 23 were eligible, reporting 17 studies. Short- and long-term PRO evidence about differences between DCIS treatment options was lacking. Evidence pooled across treatments indicated core aspects of quality of life (physical, role, social, emotional function, pain, fatigue) and psychological distress (anxiety, depression) were impacted significantly initially, with most aspects returning to population norms by 6–12 months, and all by 2 years post-operatively. Fears of recurrence and dying from breast cancer were exaggerated, occurred early and persisted for many years. Sexuality and body image impacts were generally low and resolved within 1–3 months after surgery. A minority of women experienced considerable impact, including depression and sexual issues associated with body image problems. Well-powered PRO studies are required to track recovery trajectories and long-term impacts of the range of contemporary and emerging local and systemic treatments for DCIS. PRO data would enable care providers to prepare patients for short-term sequelae and enable patients who have treatment options to exercise preferences in choosing among them.