Cognitive impairment after a stroke in young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Information about cognitive functioning is vital in the management of stroke, but the literature is mostly based on data from individuals older than 50 years of age who make up the majority of the stroke population. As cognitive functioning is subject to change due to aging, it is unclea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of stroke Vol. 18; no. 8; pp. 888 - 897
Main Authors Weterings, Rosemarije PC, Kessels, Roy PC, de Leeuw, Frank-Erik, Piai, Vitória
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Information about cognitive functioning is vital in the management of stroke, but the literature is mostly based on data from individuals older than 50 years of age who make up the majority of the stroke population. As cognitive functioning is subject to change due to aging, it is unclear whether such cognitive impairment patterns from the general stroke literature apply to the growing population of younger people with a stroke. Aim: The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion and severity of cognitive impairment in young-stroke patients. Summary of review: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to 11 October 2022. Studies were included if they reported on a population of young-stroke patients, evaluated cognitive functioning as an outcome measure, and reported original data. We estimated the pooled prevalence rates for cognitive impairment and for aphasia. In addition, we calculated the pooled estimates for the severity of impairment per cognitive domain in the chronic phase (defined as >6 months post-stroke). Six hundred thirty-five articles were identified, of which 29 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled prevalence of cognitive impairment was 44% (k = 10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 34–54%) and of aphasia 22% (k = 13; 95% CI: 12–39%). Young-stroke patients in the chronic phase performed worse than stroke-free healthy age-appropriate controls across all cognitive domains examined, with Hedges’ g effect sizes ranging from −0.49 to −1.64. Conclusion: Around half of all young-stroke patients present with cognitive impairment and around a quarter with aphasia. Our data suggest that patterns of impairment in young-stroke patients follow those in the general stroke literature.
ISSN:1747-4930
1747-4949
DOI:10.1177/17474930231159267