The gut microbiota modulates responses to anti–PD-1 and chemotherapy combination therapy and related adverse events in patients with advanced solid tumors
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been widely used in treating different malignancies. Several studies have reported that the gut microbiota modulates the response and adverse events (AEs) to ICIs in melanoma, non–small cell lung can...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 887383 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
25.10.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been widely used in treating different malignancies. Several studies have reported that the gut microbiota modulates the response and adverse events (AEs) to ICIs in melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, but data on other cancer types and ICI combination therapy are limited.
Methods
Stool samples were collected from patients with cancer who received anti–PD-1 and chemotherapy combination treatment and were analyzed by fecal metagenomic sequencing. The microbiota diversity and composition were compared between the responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups and the AE vs. the non-AE (NAE) groups. In addition, associated functional genes and metabolic pathways were identified.
Results
At baseline, the microbiota diversity of the groups was similar, but the genera
Parabacteroides
,
Clostridia bacterium UC5.1_2F7
, and
Bifidobacterium dentium
were enriched in the R group, whereas
Bacteroides dorei
and 11 species of
Nocardia
were enriched in the NR group. At 6 weeks, the beta diversity was significantly different between the R and NR groups. Further analysis found that 35 genera, such as
Alipes
,
Parabacteroides
,
Phascolarctobacterium
,
Collinsella
,
Ruminiclostridium
,
Porphyromonas
, and
Butyricimonas
and several genera of the
Fibrobacteraceae
family, were frequently distributed in the R group, whereas 17 genera, including
Enterococcus
,
Lachnoclostridium
,
Hungatella
, and
Bilophila
and several genera of the
Pseudonocardiaceae
and
Beijerinckiaceae
families, were more abundant in the NR group. A total of 66 and 52 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs (KOs) were significantly enriched in the R and NR groups, respectively. In addition, pathway analysis revealed functional differences in the gut microbacteria in the R group, including the enrichment of anabolic pathways and DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways. Dynamic comparisons of the bacterial composition at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks showed that the abundance of
Weissella
significantly increased in the R group at 6 weeks and the abundance of
Fusobacterium
and
Anaerotruncus
significantly increased in the NR group at 12 weeks. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis indicated that bacteria of
Bacteroidetes
, especially
Bacteroides
, were enriched in the NAE group, whereas flora of
Firmcutes
, such as
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
,
Bacteroides fragilis
, and
Ruminococcus lactaris
, were enriched in the AE group.
Conclusion
Beta diversity and differences in the gut microbiota modulated AEs and the response to anti–PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy, by regulating related anabolic and DDR pathways. Dynamic changes in the intestinal microbiome may predict the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor–based therapy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Gang Sun, The First Affiliated Hospital of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, China; Tiziana Schioppa, University of Brescia, Italy Edited by: Roberta Zappasodi, Cornell University, United States This article was submitted to Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology |
ISSN: | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2022.887383 |