Enhancement of growth and Cannabinoids content of hemp (Cannabis sativa) using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) to promote growth and cannabinoid yield of Cannabis sativa KKU05. A completely randomized design (CRD) was conducted with six replications for 60 days. Two different species of AMF, Rhizophagus prolifer PC2-2 and R....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in plant science Vol. 13; p. 845794
Main Authors Seemakram, Wasan, Paluka, Jakkapat, Suebrasri, Thanapat, Lapjit, Chanon, Kanokmedhakul, Somdej, Kuyper, Thomas W., Ekprasert, Jindarat, Boonlue, Sophon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 26.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) to promote growth and cannabinoid yield of Cannabis sativa KKU05. A completely randomized design (CRD) was conducted with six replications for 60 days. Two different species of AMF, Rhizophagus prolifer PC2-2 and R. aggregatus BM-3 g3 were selected as inocula and compared with two non-mycorrhizal controls, one without synthetic fertilizer and one with synthetic NPK fertilizer. The unfertilized non-mycorrhizal plants had the lowest performance, whereas plants inoculated with R. aggregatus BM-3 g3 performed best, both in terms of plant biomass and concentrations of CBD and THC. There were no significant differences in plant biomass and cannabinoid concentrations between non-mycorrhizal plants that received synthetic fertilizer and mycorrhizal plants with inoculum of R. prolifer PC2-2. Our data demonstrate the great potential for cannabis cultivation without risking deterioration of soil structure, such as soil hardening and increased acidity, which might be induced by long-term use of synthetic fertilizer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Reviewed by: Cherdchai Phosri, Nakhon Phanom University, Thailand; Federico Vita, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Edited by: Youssef Rouphael, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
ISSN:1664-462X
1664-462X
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.845794