Impact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition

Research on the acquisition of spatial knowledge not only enriches our understanding of the theory of spatial knowledge representation but also creates practical value for the application of spatial knowledge. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of different learning methods on the acq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 1322
Main Authors Qiu, Xiaohe, Wen, Lala, Wu, Changxu, Yang, Zhen, Wang, Qijun, Li, Hongting, Wang, Duming
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 16.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Research on the acquisition of spatial knowledge not only enriches our understanding of the theory of spatial knowledge representation but also creates practical value for the application of spatial knowledge. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of different learning methods on the acquisition of spatial knowledge, including the role of 2D maps, the difference between physical interaction and virtual interaction, and whether passive learning can replace active learning in virtual environments. One experiment was conducted, in which landmark knowledge and configurational knowledge were measured. Results indicate that 2D maps play a supporting role in acquiring both landmark knowledge and configurational knowledge. In addition, physical learning was associated with better spatial knowledge representation compared with virtual learning. An analysis of observational data in the third comparison found no significant difference between passive learning and active learning using virtual street view maps. However, with high-quality learning materials, passive learning can contribute to the acquisition of spatial knowledge more efficiently than active learning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Human-Media Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Mubbasir Kapadia, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States; Hélène Sauzéon, Université de Bordeaux, France
Edited by: M.-Carmen Juan, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01322