Negative Effects of "Predatory" Journals on Global Health Research

Predatory journals (PJ) exploit the open-access model promising high acceptance rate and fast track publishing without proper peer review. At minimum, PJ are eroding the credibility of the scientific literature in the health sciences as they actually boost the propagation of errors. In this article,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of global health Vol. 84; no. 4; pp. 584 - 589
Main Authors Forero, Diego A, Oermann, Marilyn H, Manca, Andrea, Deriu, Franca, Mendieta-Zerón, Hugo, Dadkhah, Mehdi, Bhad, Roshan, Deshpande, Smita N, Wang, Wei, Cifuentes, Myriam Patricia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Ubiquity Press 05.11.2018
Levy Library Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Predatory journals (PJ) exploit the open-access model promising high acceptance rate and fast track publishing without proper peer review. At minimum, PJ are eroding the credibility of the scientific literature in the health sciences as they actually boost the propagation of errors. In this article, we identify issues with PJ and provide several responses, from international and interdisciplinary perspectives in health sciences. Authors, particularly researchers with limited previous experience with international publications, need to be careful when considering potential journals for submission, due to the current existence of large numbers of PJ. Universities around the world, particularly in developing countries, might develop strategies to discourage their researchers from submitting manuscripts to PJ or serving as members of their editorial committees.
ISSN:2214-9996
2214-9996
DOI:10.29024/aogh.2389